Hi all,

The main reason I suggested the stale bot was the lack of any
widespread prioritization/reviewing of issues which results in big
pile of never addresses issues.

I think that triage access is a better answer to this problem as
engaging more people will help us all. I'm +1 for that.

Cheers,
Tomek


On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:00 PM Paola Peraza Calderon
<pa...@astronomer.io> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Paola here from Astronomer. I've been working at Astro since our early days 
> in both Customer and Product-centric roles and have of course been closely 
> following all-things Airflow for a long time.
>
> I happened to read this conversation around GH Issue management and figure I 
> can step up to volunteer as someone familiar with the project + Product Ops 
> principles, if that'd be helpful. I could always start by:
>
> - Cleaning up/commenting on duplicate issues (or close given the right 
> permissions)
> - Commenting on stale issues and investigate whether they're still a problem 
> or already addressed
> - Asking questions as needed if issues need clarification or additional 
> scoping
>
> If this would be helpful, I'm more than happy to get involved and pick at 
> these over time. It'll likely be a journey that never ends, but I think a 
> compelling need to keep the community momentum going. Let me know - and great 
> to meet you all.
>
> Cheers,
> Paola
>
> On 2020/09/10 11:56:22, Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently, we have about 582 open issues on Github. The oldest opened
> > in March. Do you think we should consider using stale bot as we do for
> > PRs?
> >
> > I don't think that issue that is open since March is "so important" to
> > keep it still open. This would also automate the process of verifying
> > the issue (the author will be notified and asked for an update). If
> > the issue is something that we want to keep open we should be able to
> > use the "pinned" label.
> >
> > Other projects use it and I don't see anything wrong with it. I would
> > say that 30d is a good period for keeping an issue open.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Bests,
> > Tomek
> >

Reply via email to