BTW. I spoke To Andrey (AKA @Taragolis) and I think (and Andrey agrees) he
would be a great member of the Triage team.

PR: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27278

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:04 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> > Losing these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because
> we lost perhaps a great future contributor/committer/triager.
>
> Cannot agree more -  that this is what I would really like to avoid !
> Pretty much Every time we lose someone passionate who loves our
> product and would be a good contributor (even just small doc changes)
> we lose an opportunity to improve Airflow.
>
> There is one watchout though (and one that it is difficult to make
> judgment on) - some of those users we "lost" would be a huge energy
> drain on the community rather than improvement. I think - with such an
> influx of issues/questions/discussions/requests it's easy to get
> yourself too much dragged into useless conversations and it's a bit of
> skill to judge when it is better to lose someone rather than drag the
> conversation forward.
>
> Maybe it would be worth updating the docs with a comment about being
> assertive as a triager.
>
> J
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:56 PM Daniel Standish
> <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> 3. I am also getting a true sense of just how overwhelming the influx
> of Issues, PRs and Discussions is. I have come across several folks who
> submitted PRs and never got feedback and then left the community. Losing
> these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because we lost
> perhaps a great future contributor/committer/triager. We certainly need all
> the help we can get on this front, for reviewing, providing feedback and
> ultimately merging folks' contributions.
> >
> > Yeah that's very sad and a very important point.
> >
>

Reply via email to