Hello,

Correction: since it is a vote on code modification, all committers' votes
count, I was mistaken in my previous email (which mentioned only PMC votes
are binding), quite new in this process.
Please let me know if a discussion thread is preferred.

Thanks,
Regards,
Philippe

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 5:34 PM Philippe Lanoe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Airflow community!
>
> As requested in our PR, I would like to start a vote for adding a new
> provider (Cloudera). Please note that this vote is about the fact to add
> this new provider not about the code itself, which will be reviewed as part
> of the PR.
>
> We would like to contribute the Cloudera provider to allow data
> practitioners out-of-the-box interactions with a multi-function analytics
> and hybrid platform,
>
> Our first two Operators are CdeRunJobOperator, to run a CDE job (Spark or
> Airflow within the Cloudera Data Engineering service) and
> CdwExecuteQueryOperator, to execute a query on a managed CDW cluster (Hive
> / Impala within the Cloudera Data Warehousing service). It also comes with
> a Sensor for CDW, in order to wait on a Hive partition.
> We are also planning to contribute more in the future, as we develop
> operators for other Cloudera services in Cloudera Data Platform (CDP), like
> Cloudera Machine Learning and others, to cover the various needs of data
> practitioners across the entire data lifecycle.
>
> Our code has been already used for quite some time internally and we would
> like to contribute it to Airflow, to give a better experience for the users
> as it would be another system that users can reach seamlessly in their
> pipelines.
>
> Another important Note: Cloudera already filed a CCLA as mentioned in
> this thread
> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27866#issuecomment-1329743517>,
> so I think we are OK on the Legal side.
>
> You can find the PR here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27866
>
> The voting will last for 6 days (until 6th of December 2022, 6pm UTC), and
> until at least 3 binding votes have been cast. I am sure about the
> timeframe which is needed for providers actually, please let me know if it
> is adequate.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] + 1 approve
> [ ] + 0 no opinion
> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
> of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> "(non-binding)".
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Philippe
>
>
>

Reply via email to