+1 for removal

On 2023/11/16 18:54:15 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> More detailed comparison:
> 
> apache-airflow 2.7.* ~ 255.000 downloads/day
> apache-aurflow-provider-dask-executor ~ 900/ day
> 
> This means that *apache-airflow-providers-daskexecutor * is downloaded in
> less of *0.3 %* cases, comparing to *apache-airflow*
> 
> I'd say it's negligible usage.
> 
> My personal vote would go for immediate removal.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:20 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Now that the code is in its own provider we can check the download stats
> >> of
> >> the library via Pypi stats.
> >>
> >>
> > Good point but this is only an indication.
> >
> > Currently this is only for Airflow 2.7+ and it is a bit difficult to
> > compare those. The "fixed" numbers are misleading (we still do not know
> > where the 400.000 downloads/day jump to almost 1Million / day came from
> > mid-October.
> > The ratio is now 1000/day (daskexecutor): 800.000 day (airflow) ->  ~0.1
> > %. But those are only downloads - and not whether it's used - likely there
> > are a number of cases where CI pulls "all" extras.
> >
> > J.
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to