+1 All for removing it if it's not in use and is giving us trouble with maintaining.
-- Regards, Aritra Basu On Fri, Nov 17, 2023, 1:47 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote: > Theres very little incentive in maintaining this if theres no one actively > maintaining it. > > I am totally for the removal +1 > > > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 1:21 AM, Collin McNulty > <col...@astronomer.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 for removal > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:43 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: > > > > > > we would do it branching off at the TAG when the last release > happened > > > and develop/release a fix from there. > > > > > > Since it would be possible to release security patches, +1 to remove > it. > > > > > > On Thu 16 Nov 2023 at 21:22, Oliveira, Niko > <oniko...@amazon.com.invalid > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If no one comes forward willing to support the executor long term I'm > > +1 > > > > for removal. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 10:59:40 AM > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [DISCUSS] Suspend > (Remove?) > > > > Daskexecutor provider > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do > not > > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and > > > know > > > > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > > externe. > > > > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne > > > pouvez > > > > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas > certain > > > que > > > > le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for removal > > > > > > > > On 2023/11/16 18:54:15 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > > More detailed comparison: > > > > > > > > > > apache-airflow 2.7.* ~ 255.000 downloads/day > > > > > apache-aurflow-provider-dask-executor ~ 900/ day > > > > > > > > > > This means that *apache-airflow-providers-daskexecutor * is > > downloaded > > > in > > > > > less of *0.3 %* cases, comparing to *apache-airflow* > > > > > > > > > > I'd say it's negligible usage. > > > > > > > > > > My personal vote would go for immediate removal. > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:20 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Now that the code is in its own provider we can check the > download > > > > stats > > > > > >> of > > > > > >> the library via Pypi stats. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Good point but this is only an indication. > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently this is only for Airflow 2.7+ and it is a bit difficult > > to > > > > > > compare those. The "fixed" numbers are misleading (we still do > not > > > know > > > > > > where the 400.000 downloads/day jump to almost 1Million / day > came > > > from > > > > > > mid-October. > > > > > > The ratio is now 1000/day (daskexecutor): 800.000 day (airflow) > -> > > > > ~0.1 > > > > > > %. But those are only downloads - and not whether it's used - > > likely > > > > there > > > > > > are a number of cases where CI pulls "all" extras. > > > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
