+1 Option B (binding)
On 2025/10/20 19:07:05 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 Option B (binding) > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM Constance Martineau via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > As discussed in this email thread > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh>, I am > > formally calling a vote to finalize how we refer to Airflow workflows in > > writing. The vote will run for roughly 72 hours, and last until Thursday > > October 23rd at 7:00 pm UTC (countdown link > > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6656693>) > > > > The options are: > > > > - Option A: Prefer dag in docs; use DAG only when referring to the > > class/import > > - Option B: Prefer Dag in docs; use DAG only for the class/import > > - Option C: Keep DAG as the standard everywhere (status quo) > > - Option D: Prefer Dag in docs, use Dag for class/import and alias DAG > > (for backcompat reasons) > > > > You can vote any fractional between -1 and +1 for any of the options, and > > the option with the highest sum (even if it's a negative) wins. This is a > > procedural vote, meaning that -1 is not considered a veto. Everyone is > > encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committer's votes are > > considered binding. > > > > Please see email thread > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh> for > > additional context. > > > > Why this matters: We’ve had inconsistent terminology across docs and > > repeated PR debates over capitalization. Standardizing will make our > > writing clearer, strengthen the Airflow brand, and give external > > stakeholders a single reference to follow. > > > > Best, > > Constance > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
