Option C

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 22:48, Jens Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 Option B (binding)
>
> Note for me Option C is not the state we have today, I assume all across
> the codebase and docs a mixture is to be found. So even if Option C is
> decided a cleanup is needed probably.
>
> On 20.10.25 22:12, Oliveira, Niko wrote:
> > +1 Option B (binding).
> >
> > To me if we're stepping away from the meaning the acronym used to have
> and coining a new Airflow name for our workflows, then we should capitalize
> it like any other proper noun.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Niko
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Vincent Beck <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 12:19:53 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] Finalizing “DAG” terminology for docs and blog
> ("dag" vs "DAG" vs "Dag")
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous
> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas
> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 Option B (binding)
> >
> >
> > On 2025/10/20 19:07:05 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >> +1 Option B (binding)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM Constance Martineau via dev <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> As discussed in this email thread
> >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh>, I
> am
> >>> formally calling a vote to finalize how we refer to Airflow workflows
> in
> >>> writing. The vote will run for roughly 72 hours, and last until
> Thursday
> >>> October 23rd at 7:00 pm UTC (countdown link
> >>> <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6656693>)
> >>>
> >>> The options are:
> >>>
> >>>     - Option A: Prefer dag in docs; use DAG only when referring to the
> >>>     class/import
> >>>     - Option B: Prefer Dag in docs; use DAG only for the class/import
> >>>     - Option C: Keep DAG as the standard everywhere (status quo)
> >>>     - Option D: Prefer Dag in docs, use Dag for class/import and alias
> DAG
> >>>     (for backcompat reasons)
> >>>
> >>> You can vote any fractional between -1 and +1 for any of the options,
> and
> >>> the option with the highest sum (even if it's a negative) wins. This
> is a
> >>> procedural vote, meaning that -1 is not considered a veto.  Everyone is
> >>> encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committer's votes are
> >>> considered binding.
> >>>
> >>> Please see email thread
> >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh> for
> >>> additional context.
> >>>
> >>> Why this matters: We’ve had inconsistent terminology across docs and
> >>> repeated PR debates over capitalization. Standardizing will make our
> >>> writing clearer, strengthen the Airflow brand, and give external
> >>> stakeholders a single reference to follow.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Constance
> >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to