+1 Option B (binding) On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:45 AM Ankit Chaurasia <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 Option B > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:29 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > One small question. For option A, what should be used to start a > > sentence, DAG or Dag? > > > > I propose (if option A passes), "A dag" or "The dag" or "This dag" or > "Some > > dag" or whatever is appropriate. > > > > J. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 4:42 AM Tzu-ping Chung via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > One small question. For option A, what should be used to start a > > sentence, > > > DAG or Dag? > > > > > > > > > > On 21 Oct 2025, at 03:02, Constance Martineau via dev < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > As discussed in this email thread > > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh>, > I > > am > > > > formally calling a vote to finalize how we refer to Airflow workflows > > in > > > > writing. The vote will run for roughly 72 hours, and last until > > Thursday > > > > October 23rd at 7:00 pm UTC (countdown link > > > > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6656693>) > > > > > > > > The options are: > > > > > > > > - Option A: Prefer dag in docs; use DAG only when referring to the > > > > class/import > > > > - Option B: Prefer Dag in docs; use DAG only for the class/import > > > > - Option C: Keep DAG as the standard everywhere (status quo) > > > > - Option D: Prefer Dag in docs, use Dag for class/import and alias > > DAG > > > > (for backcompat reasons) > > > > > > > > You can vote any fractional between -1 and +1 for any of the options, > > and > > > > the option with the highest sum (even if it's a negative) wins. This > > is a > > > > procedural vote, meaning that -1 is not considered a veto. Everyone > is > > > > encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committer's votes are > > > > considered binding. > > > > > > > > Please see email thread > > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh> > for > > > > additional context. > > > > > > > > Why this matters: We’ve had inconsistent terminology across docs and > > > > repeated PR debates over capitalization. Standardizing will make our > > > > writing clearer, strengthen the Airflow brand, and give external > > > > stakeholders a single reference to follow. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Constance > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
