+1 Option B (binding)

(I'd really prefer D but it seems that has no chance to pass, and anything
but DAG 😁)

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:05 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Option c +1
>
> Pavan
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 15:47, Collin McNulty <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Option D +1
> > Option B +0.5
> >
> > (Non-binding)
> >
> > > On Oct 20, 2025, at 2:02 PM, Constance Martineau via dev <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > As discussed in this email thread
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh>, I
> am
> > > formally calling a vote to finalize how we refer to Airflow workflows
> in
> > > writing. The vote will run for roughly 72 hours, and last until
> Thursday
> > > October 23rd at 7:00 pm UTC (countdown link
> > > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6656693>)
> > >
> > > The options are:
> > >
> > >   - Option A: Prefer dag in docs; use DAG only when referring to the
> > >   class/import
> > >   - Option B: Prefer Dag in docs; use DAG only for the class/import
> > >   - Option C: Keep DAG as the standard everywhere (status quo)
> > >   - Option D: Prefer Dag in docs, use Dag for class/import and alias
> DAG
> > >   (for backcompat reasons)
> > >
> > > You can vote any fractional between -1 and +1 for any of the options,
> and
> > > the option with the highest sum (even if it's a negative) wins. This
> is a
> > > procedural vote, meaning that -1 is not considered a veto.  Everyone is
> > > encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committer's votes are
> > > considered binding.
> > >
> > > Please see email thread
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh> for
> > > additional context.
> > >
> > > Why this matters: We’ve had inconsistent terminology across docs and
> > > repeated PR debates over capitalization. Standardizing will make our
> > > writing clearer, strengthen the Airflow brand, and give external
> > > stakeholders a single reference to follow.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Constance
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to