I know I do not have to, but that looks good to me. On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 11:47 AM Dev-iL <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > In continuation to the below two threads discussing new best practice > proposals and the accompanying Ruff rules, > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/1oh64pgco8bcbsxyyyflm7ccg1x3frol (use > .output instead of xcom_pull + jinja) > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/odmymy6kn5rqx17x44ydq43c1vfqh511 > (replace task.branch with task.short_circuit) > > I'd like to start a lazy consensus ending in ~71h (10 AM UTC 23/03/2026) > to approve these proposals and move ahead according to the guidelines, > which means adding them to the Airflow docs and merging the associated > Ruff rules. > > Best, > > Iliya (Dev-iL) > > > See also: > > [1] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23583 — Ruff PR implementing > `airflow-xcom-pull-in-template-string` > > [2] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23579 — Ruff PR implementing > `task-branch-as-short-circuit` > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
