BW, I hope that after the recent ownership change our "unspoken" agreement on Android ruff rules—where Astral consulted us about the rules—will be kept.
But I think we should be ready to adapt. J. On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 12:25 PM Dev-iL <[email protected]> wrote: > Lazy consensus passed. > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, 12:45 Dev-iL, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In continuation to the below two threads discussing new best practice > > proposals and the accompanying Ruff rules, > > > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/1oh64pgco8bcbsxyyyflm7ccg1x3frol (use > > .output instead of xcom_pull + jinja) > > > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/odmymy6kn5rqx17x44ydq43c1vfqh511 > > (replace task.branch with task.short_circuit) > > > > I'd like to start a lazy consensus ending in ~71h (10 AM UTC 23/03/2026) > > to approve these proposals and move ahead according to the guidelines, > > which means adding them to the Airflow docs and merging the associated > > Ruff rules. > > > > Best, > > > > Iliya (Dev-iL) > > > > > > See also: > > > > [1] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23583 — Ruff PR implementing > > `airflow-xcom-pull-in-template-string` > > > > [2] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23579 — Ruff PR implementing > > `task-branch-as-short-circuit` > > > > >
