On Dec 18, 2007 7:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does the site repository [1] contains the "sources" of the site? (Means > before generation)?
Exactly. > > > I havent spent any time on Ants site repo [2]. But if we think that Ivy is > a subproject of Ant, Ivys homepage is a subpage of Ants. So we could store > Ivys generated pages in the generated directory [3] of that repo and upload > it via its buildfile [4]. Or we could put generated ivy site at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/site/generated (to follow ant convention) and use svn:externals in [3] to make it "part" of ant site so that it's updated automatically whenever svn up is called on the site on people.a.o. For the site generation itself, we don't use the same technology (anakia / xooki) and for xooki we require ant 1.7 and java 6, so I'm not sure merging the two site generation is a good idea (if I understand correctly what you suggest). Xavier > > > > Jan > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/site/ > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/site/ > [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/site/generated/ > [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/site/build.xml > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 23:24 > > An: Ant Developers List > > Betreff: Re: Ivy web site > > > > I'd prefer having the site in SVN too... > > btw, the rights on the /www/ant.apache.org/ivy directory > > aren't correct, I can't create new files in it. Could you update that? > > > > Maarten > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:40:10 AM > > Subject: Ivy web site > > > > > > Hi, > > > > The problem for the download page is now fixed, but it has raised some > > questions about how we manage our web site: > > - we are not in sync with what the apache documentation says on how to > > manage web sites [1]. We should put generated site in svn to comply > > - by uploading the generated web site, we do not support the > > executable > > flag > > which is a problem for download.cgi > > - uploading the whole site takes a long time sometimes for small > > changes > > only, using svn would rely on diff only which would make the "upload" > > (would > > be a commit actually) more efficient. > > > > Hence I'm in favor of storing the result of site generation in svn and > > checkout this result on people.a.o for the web site. Making changes to > > the > > site would still be done to the site source, and a generation > > (requiring ant > > 1.7 and java 6) would still be necessary. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Xavier > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html > > > > -- > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > ______________________ > > Be a better friend, newshound, and > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
