Yes, I'm definitely suggesting/hyping JUnit 5. :) On 3 May 2018 at 12:01, Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My focus was on maximising the use of JUnit 4 idioms. > Are you suggesting a switch to JUnit 5 instead? > Sounds like Ant 1.11 :-) > > Gintas > > 2018-05-03 17:12 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>: > > > I've started using JUnit 5 in a personal project and found that it has a > > lot more useful features for test parameters. For instance, they now > > support parameterized test methods instead of just the class itself. > There > > are also more convenient ways of injecting test data through annotations > > and such. Plus, JUnit 5 still supports v3 and v4 tests, so it's not a > mass > > migration effort, either. > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
