Yes, I'm definitely suggesting/hyping JUnit 5. :)

On 3 May 2018 at 12:01, Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> My focus was on maximising the use of JUnit 4 idioms.
> Are you suggesting a switch to JUnit 5 instead?
> Sounds like Ant 1.11 :-)
>
> Gintas
>
> 2018-05-03 17:12 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I've started using JUnit 5 in a personal project and found that it has a
> > lot more useful features for test parameters. For instance, they now
> > support parameterized test methods instead of just the class itself.
> There
> > are also more convenient ways of injecting test data through annotations
> > and such. Plus, JUnit 5 still supports v3 and v4 tests, so it's not a
> mass
> > migration effort, either.
>
> --
> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to