On 2018-10-28, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 17:59, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I wonder whether it wouldn't be a good idea to create a separate class >> for constants used during testing that lives in ant-testutil rather than >> poluting the "magic names" of Ant. > The problem is that should such class end up in ant-testutil, it makes ant > dependent on ant-util and that creates a dependency loop. I'm talking about the "magic names" only used in tests. The four properties with names that start with TEST_ shoul dnot be used inside the rest of Ant, are they? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
