On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 18:17, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2018-10-28, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 17:59, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> I wonder whether it wouldn't be a good idea to create a separate class > >> for constants used during testing that lives in ant-testutil rather than > >> poluting the "magic names" of Ant. > > > The problem is that should such class end up in ant-testutil, it makes > ant > > dependent on ant-util and that creates a dependency loop. > > I'm talking about the "magic names" only used in tests. The four > properties with names that start with TEST_ should not be used inside > the rest of Ant, are they? > I understand your point. TEST_ properties are only for tests. But, the tests themselves are a part of Ant core. Therefore, a separate class (MagicTestNames or some such) would still be a part of Ant core. Gintas
