Hi Matthias, >> Am I right when I assume that myComp is the same as in the first line >> and that it does not make a difference in using it? > > No. > >> If so, why is the xStorable derived from myComp = null and the xStorable >> derived from this.xComponent the correct value? > > myComp points to a Controller object. This object doesn not support > XStorable. > > this.xComponent points to a Model object. This object *does* support > XStorable. > > Both objects OTOH support XComponent (as some others do). And *all* > objects support XInterface. Where is the problem? > > It seems that you mixed up the "component" of a frame (an abstract term > for the "something" that a frame may contain) with the interface > XComponent that can be (and is) implemented by a lot of objects in OOo, > most of them will never become attached to a frame. > >> Maybe this behaviour is correct. If so, please tell me why. What I want >> to explain all the time is, that I think there should be no difference >> using myComp and this.xComponent, but it is a great difference. > > myComp and this.xComponent from your example are interface references > that belong to different objects. You should read the chapter about > Frames, Controllers, Models in the DevGuide to understand the difference > between models and controllers.
Now the things I wanted to do are working. Thank you for your explanations. Now I see, that your tip to read the capter about Frames,... is really useful for me. I mixed up something. Sorry for taking so long time. But thanks a lot for your great help! Greetings, Tobias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
