> From: 'Aaron Bannert' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:08:56PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Well, for one thing, you can't make a proposal with just the names that > > you like. A meritocracy means that you must accept that other people > > may not agree with your ideas. Since there were other options offered > > (whether you like them or not), they must be in the vote, or the vote is > > completely invalid. Even if you want to veto those options, they must > > be in the vote, or you aren't giving people an opportunity to change > > your mind. > > I don't want to get in to technicalities nor the definition of a > meritocracy, but I would like to point out that by offering my > proposal I'm in no way acting as though the other proposals don't > exist. I'm just offering one solution, either you like it, don't care, > or dislike it.
But by only offering your options, you have tainted the vote. It would be like if I said: What is your favorite ice cream? [ ] Chocolate [ ] Strawberry if I get 10 Chocolate votes and 3 Strawberry votes, I may be inclined to say: "Chocolate is the best ice cream flavor." But I can't say that, because I didn't offer Vanilla (or a hundred other flavors) as an option. By only offering the solution that you like, you automatically bias the vote, and the whole vote becomes invalid. Ryan