Perhaps it doesn't belong anywhere in the ASF and should just be Open Sourced through other means. The problem is that the subproject is "HTTP Server", and there are lots of nice things that don't really fit with that project, but in a more general 'web' project, which would include clients/servers/libs.
-- Jon On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:58:25AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > I don't understand. Is there something in httpd that would need el-kabong? > Flood could definately use it, but I really don't want to make flood > dependent on both httpd and APR, especially when flood is a _client_ > and the httpd _server_ project is a server. HTML is more general than > server-side HTTP, IMHO. > > -aaron > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:54:48AM -0700, Jon Travis wrote: > > I personally think it belongs as some kind of sub-project to httpd, but > > not in the same tree. > > > > -- Jon > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:02:47AM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > I would prefer that this became it's own project either under the > > > > > httpd > > > > > project or the APR project. I don't believe that it should be a part > > > > > of > > > > > the APR-util library however. > > > > > > > > The functionality provided by el-kabong seems like a good fit within > > > > APR. > > > > I think it would be fine if el-kabong became a new subproject of APR. > > > > > > > > > > Personally, I think it's very cool that E-K is being folded into the > > > ASF. I think the httpd project is a better fit however, simply > > > because APR should be protocol ignorant. > > > > > > -- > > > =========================================================================== > > > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > > > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > > > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
