On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:57:50AM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote: > On the other hand though, I think it's totally pointless to go build > another memcached implementation as part of APR-Util just for testing > purposes. That time would be far better spent writing some tests that > require a locally running memcached instance. > Indeed - requiring everyone to test everything is pointless. I wonder if it would make sense for a future version of the tests in apr/apr-util to include a summary of what was tested making it easier to post results?
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
