On 3/23/2011 7:02 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >> >>> Repeating my requests from last year: >>> >>> I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next >>> release to fix this Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta. >> >> Any concerns out there with this fix for Windows? There's no CHANGES >> entry, so it may have been overlooked. > > (wrowe discussed this previously, and may or may not get time to > resolve in the short term)
I'll be able to propose the resolution by midday Thursday and make sure that Bert and I are satisfied with the solution from the svn perspective. >> A couple of other fixes in trunk CHANGES to consider backporting: >> >> *) apr_dbd_oracle: fix endianness issue in prepared statements >> PR 50690 [Stefan Ruppert <sr myarm.com>] >> >> *) Fix address handling when accepting an AF_INET socket from a socket >> bound as AF_INET6. PR 49678. [Joe Orton] > > I forgot about these two, and will go look. > > What else before 1.4.3/1.3.11? > > * wrowe is working on another issue which (I guess) requires a couple more > days > * I may find time to backport some revisions from trunk to get MinGW > in better shape if I'm "sure" it won't break anything else > ** several trunk revisions of .in/.m4 foo will get 1.4.x running the > test suite pretty well; call it "experimental" since the feature set > doesn't exactly match a normal Windows build, it only builds static > libs, etc.) The issues I'm working on should be wrapped up by Thursday evening.
