Hi,

it's clear that we have not yet an agreed decision about that. So here is 
another (my) opinion on 1.0:

I'd vote for a 1.0 release when we have:
1. stable UML2 support with all diagrams and OCL
2. Undo/Redo

I don't think UML 1.4 is enough for a 1.0 release in 2011, we're years too late 
for that.

I also don't think that internal interfaces are to be considered for the 1.0 
release, because a "1.0" clearly should address users, not developers. Also 
eclipse integration or integration of/into other frameworks (e.g. GEF 
substitution) are not criteria in my eyes.

For marketing reasons, one could also consider visual changes that will come 
with 1.0, but this is not what I'd be interested in. Maybe a new 
logo/splashscreen. I don't care too much here.

Just my 2 cents.

Thomas

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:38:44 +0200
> Von: Michiel van der Wulp <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] Release 1.0 (was - Release schedule)

> On 25-05-11 13:31, Bob Tarling wrote:
> > 3. ASAP
> >
> > As an application ArgoUML is stable and improving. So moving to
> > release 1.0 promotes that stability to the users. The users don't
> > really care that our internal interfaces are not particularly well
> > defined.
> 
> Hmmm,  I would like to have ArgoUML 1.0 now as the stable release to use 
> for UML 1 and then after a while ArgoUML 2.0 as the first stable release 
> supporting UML2...
> Yes, V1.0 ASAP.
> Michiel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2747842
> 
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [[email protected]].
> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
> email: [[email protected]]

-- 
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!                  
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone

------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2747874

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: 
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: 
[[email protected]]

Reply via email to