Hello,
it sounds like a good plan then :)

I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would like to
still support

Domain                      │ Source │ CI Testing        │ Multi-Version
────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────
async                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
blueprint                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
blueprint-maven-plugin      │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
esa-ant-task                │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
esa-maven-plugin            │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
jmx                         │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
jndi                        │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
proxy                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
pushstream                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
quiesce                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
samples                     │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
spi-fly                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
subsystem                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
testsupport                 │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
transaction                 │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
tutorials                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
util                        │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
versioning                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
web                         │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅



Pozdrawiam/Regards,
Dominik Przybysz

sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider <
[email protected]> napisał:

> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would opt for
> 11 as the
> safe choice.
>
> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would be a good
> choice.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi JBO,
> > it's great to hear :)
> >
> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in
> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884.
> >
> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right version,
> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we should
> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have in
> Aries.
> >
> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported versions e.g.
> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java?
> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other hand I
> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+
> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working on Aries
> > and
> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the new
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly Dominik, on
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy,
> blueprint,
> > > > etc).
> > > >
> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the preparation.
> > > >
> > > > Any objections?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Dominik Przybysz
> >
>
>
> --
> --
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>

Reply via email to