Hi Dominik I don't want to release everything in one round, because it's pretty hard to review.
I was more thinking about starting with util/proxy and then blueprint, and then jmx, etc. Wdyt ? Regards JB On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 5:39 PM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm happy to hear that :) > > What order of releases are you planning? Are you going to release > everything right now as the last artifacts supporting java 8? > > Meantime I started preparing blueprint for Java > 8 in > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/785 > Current status is: > - for java >= 11 Spring and SpringExtender itests fails - problem with > classloader for namespaces > - for java >= 17 Quiesce itests fails - problem with namespaces > - for java >= 25 Authorization itests fails - problem with incompatible > java API (removed javax.security.auth.Subject.getSubject) > > niedz., 1 lut 2026 o 16:19 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > >> Hi folks, >> >> I saw new updates from Dominik (thanks a lot !). I'm rebasing and doing >> the >> pass. I will start the round of release to vote asap. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks ! It helps ! >> > >> > Let me do a pass then :) >> > >> > Regards >> > JB >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:28 AM Dominik Przybysz < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> it sounds like a good plan then :) >> >> >> >> I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would like >> to >> >> still support >> >> >> >> Domain │ Source │ CI Testing │ >> Multi-Version >> >> >> ────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼─────────────── >> >> async │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> blueprint │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> blueprint-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> esa-ant-task │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> esa-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> jmx │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> jndi │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> proxy │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> pushstream │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> quiesce │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> samples │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> spi-fly │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> subsystem │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> testsupport │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> transaction │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> tutorials │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> >> util │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> versioning │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> web │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Pozdrawiam/Regards, >> >> Dominik Przybysz >> >> >> >> sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider < >> >> [email protected]> napisał: >> >> >> >>> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would opt >> for >> >>> 11 as the >> >>> safe choice. >> >>> >> >>> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would be a >> >>> good >> >>> choice. >> >>> >> >>> Christian >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Hi JBO, >> >>> > it's great to hear :) >> >>> > >> >>> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in >> >>> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884. >> >>> > >> >>> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right >> >>> version, >> >>> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we >> should >> >>> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have in >> >>> Aries. >> >>> > >> >>> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported versions >> >>> e.g. >> >>> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java? >> >>> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other >> hand >> >>> I >> >>> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+ >> >>> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html. >> >>> > >> >>> > WDYT? >> >>> > >> >>> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> >>> > napisał(a): >> >>> > >> >>> > > Hi everyone, >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working on >> >>> Aries >> >>> > and >> >>> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the new >> >>> > > releases. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly >> Dominik, >> >>> on >> >>> > > this. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Regards, >> >>> > > JB >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> > > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Hi everyone, >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy, >> >>> blueprint, >> >>> > > > etc). >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the preparation. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Any objections? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Regards >> >>> > > > JB >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Regards, >> >>> > Dominik Przybysz >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >>> Computer Scientist >> >>> http://www.adobe.com >> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Dominik Przybysz >
