Hi folks, I saw new updates from Dominik (thanks a lot !). I'm rebasing and doing the pass. I will start the round of release to vote asap.
Regards JB On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks ! It helps ! > > Let me do a pass then :) > > Regards > JB > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:28 AM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> it sounds like a good plan then :) >> >> I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would like to >> still support >> >> Domain │ Source │ CI Testing │ Multi-Version >> ────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼─────────────── >> async │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> blueprint │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> blueprint-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> esa-ant-task │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> esa-maven-plugin │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> jmx │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> jndi │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> proxy │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> pushstream │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> quiesce │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> samples │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> spi-fly │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> subsystem │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> testsupport │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> transaction │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> tutorials │ 8 │ 8 │ NO >> util │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> versioning │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> web │ 8 │ 8, 11, 17, 21 │ YES ✅ >> >> >> >> Pozdrawiam/Regards, >> Dominik Przybysz >> >> sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider < >> [email protected]> napisał: >> >>> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would opt for >>> 11 as the >>> safe choice. >>> >>> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would be a >>> good >>> choice. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi JBO, >>> > it's great to hear :) >>> > >>> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in >>> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884. >>> > >>> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right >>> version, >>> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we should >>> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have in >>> Aries. >>> > >>> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported versions >>> e.g. >>> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java? >>> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other hand >>> I >>> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+ >>> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html. >>> > >>> > WDYT? >>> > >>> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> > napisał(a): >>> > >>> > > Hi everyone, >>> > > >>> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working on >>> Aries >>> > and >>> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the new >>> > > releases. >>> > > >>> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly Dominik, >>> on >>> > > this. >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > JB >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi everyone, >>> > > > >>> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy, >>> blueprint, >>> > > > etc). >>> > > > >>> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the preparation. >>> > > > >>> > > > Any objections? >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards >>> > > > JB >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Regards, >>> > Dominik Przybysz >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> >>> Computer Scientist >>> http://www.adobe.com >>> >>
