Hi,
I'm happy to hear that :)

What order of releases are you planning? Are you going to release
everything right now as the last artifacts supporting java 8?

Meantime I started preparing blueprint for Java > 8 in
https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/785
Current status is:
- for java >= 11 Spring and SpringExtender itests fails - problem with
classloader for namespaces
- for java >= 17 Quiesce itests fails - problem with namespaces
- for java >= 25 Authorization itests fails - problem with incompatible
java API (removed javax.security.auth.Subject.getSubject)

niedz., 1 lut 2026 o 16:19 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
napisał(a):

> Hi folks,
>
> I saw new updates from Dominik (thanks a lot !). I'm rebasing and doing the
> pass. I will start the round of release to vote asap.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks ! It helps !
> >
> > Let me do a pass then :)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:28 AM Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> it sounds like a good plan then :)
> >>
> >> I extracted the current state so we can by the way what we would like to
> >> still support
> >>
> >> Domain                      │ Source │ CI Testing        │ Multi-Version
> >>
> ────────────────────────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────
> >> async                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> blueprint                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> blueprint-maven-plugin      │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> esa-ant-task                │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> esa-maven-plugin            │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> jmx                         │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> jndi                        │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> proxy                       │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> pushstream                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> quiesce                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> samples                     │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> spi-fly                     │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> subsystem                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> testsupport                 │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> transaction                 │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> tutorials                   │   8    │ 8                 │ NO
> >> util                        │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> versioning                  │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >> web                         │   8    │ 8, 11, 17, 21     │ YES ✅
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Pozdrawiam/Regards,
> >> Dominik Przybysz
> >>
> >> sob., 24 sty 2026, 09:47 użytkownik Christian Schneider <
> >> [email protected]> napisał:
> >>
> >>> I think when we have to decide between Java 8 and 11 then I would opt
> for
> >>> 11 as the
> >>> safe choice.
> >>>
> >>> I agree with JB that java 11 now and 17 after the releases would be a
> >>> good
> >>> choice.
> >>>
> >>> Christian
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 17:38, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi JBO,
> >>> > it's great to hear :)
> >>> >
> >>> > You raised a question about minimal Java version supported in
> >>> > https://github.com/apache/aries/pull/414#issuecomment-3721877884.
> >>> >
> >>> > I thought that since Java 8 is still supported it would be right
> >>> version,
> >>> > but there are less and less libraries supporting it. I feel we should
> >>> > together decide about the minimal version of Java we want to have in
> >>> Aries.
> >>> >
> >>> > Maybe we would like to declare some policy about supported versions
> >>> e.g.
> >>> > that we support 2 or 3 last LTS versions of Java?
> >>> > Current bnd supports java 17 as the mininal version. On the other
> hand
> >>> I
> >>> > see that Apache Karaf is still supporting java 11+
> >>> > https://karaf.apache.org/download.html.
> >>> >
> >>> > WDYT?
> >>> >
> >>> > czw., 8 sty 2026 o 06:01 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >>> > napisał(a):
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi everyone,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I apologize for the delay in my response. I am back to working on
> >>> Aries
> >>> > and
> >>> > > will now review the CI and dependencies in preparation for the new
> >>> > > releases.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I look forward to collaborating with you all, particularly Dominik,
> >>> on
> >>> > > this.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Regards,
> >>> > > JB
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi everyone,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I would like to propose a new set of Aries releases (proxy,
> >>> blueprint,
> >>> > > > etc).
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I have some fixes on the way, and I can start the preparation.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Any objections?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Regards
> >>> > > > JB
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Dominik Przybysz
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Computer Scientist
> >>> http://www.adobe.com
> >>>
> >>
>


-- 
Regards,
Dominik Przybysz

Reply via email to