+1 for 1.8.0.

I'd like to get the date/time support and one fix to the logical types API. The issues are:

* AVRO-1692: Allow multiple logical type representations for a class
* AVRO-1672: Adds date/time logical types and conversions
* AVRO-1684: Adds date/time types to Specific

rb

On 07/01/2015 02:10 PM, Tom White wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
+1 for a 1.8.0 release. What kind of timeline for the first RC are you
looking at?

In the next week or so. Hopefully we can decide anything else we'd
like to include and get it reviewed and committed in that time.


On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Zoltan Farkas <zolyfar...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:

I would like to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667> resolved in 1.8.0 if
possible.
This issue prevents serializing/deserializing objects with certain schemas…

—Z


On Jul 1, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:

Hi,

I would say go for the 1.8.0

Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for
this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility":

- AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2
  ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools
compiled against hadoop2 )
- AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8

On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix'
choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included):
   AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user code
more readable.

Niels Basjes

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,

It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create
a release candidate so we can vote on it.

What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very
few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0
from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor
release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that?

The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here:

http://s.apache.org/Cdt

And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here:

http://s.apache.org/5ShO

Thanks,
Tom



--
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,

Niels Basjes




--
Sean


--
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Cloudera, Inc.

Reply via email to