I did a similar fight with forrest a few weeks ago trying to get pig to
build in docker.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4526 for the current draft of
that.
In this case it turned out to be a case where Forrest 0.8 would fail with
strange errors when ran under a "new" jvm.
Where "new" is java 6 or newer...

Niels

On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:14 Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Quick update: after spending way too much time fighting Forrest I've
> managed to get the full build working on Docker to the point where all
> tests pass and all artifacts are created and signed. (If you're
> interested you can try it out by typing './build.sh docker', then
> './build.sh clean dist' in the Docker container.)
>
> I had hoped to roll a release this week, and I'm travelling for the
> next two weeks so it will probably have to wait until I'm back.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > I committed the Ruby fixes that Sean reviewed, and I've looked at
> > Marcin's patch. Is anyone familiar with the C implementation able to
> > take a look at Thomas' patch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Thomas Sanchez <thomas.san...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Sorry to bust in, but if one could take a final look at AVRO-1663, I'd
> >> appreciate.
> >> It is a minor fix.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> 2015-07-07 17:16 GMT+02:00 Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>:
> >>> I have done non-binding reviews on the following, if a committer could
> take
> >>> look:
> >>>
> >>> * AVRO-1645
> >>> * AVRO-1693
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Committers - please take a look at the outstanding patch available
> >>>> JIRAs for 1.7.8/1.8.0 and review and commit any that you'd like to see
> >>>> in 1.8.0:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://s.apache.org/xXz
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Thanks Niels. Comments inline.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl>
> wrote:
> >>>> >> Hi,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I would say go for the 1.8.0
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include
> for
> >>>> >> this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards
> compatibility":
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> - AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2
> >>>> >>   ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools
> >>>> >> compiled against hadoop2 )
> >>>> >> - AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I've committed both of these now.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix'
> >>>> >> choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included):
> >>>> >>    AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user
> code
> >>>> >> more readable.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I think this is a "won't fix" as it doesn't seem to produce any real
> >>>> > increase in readability and could actually be confusing.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks,
> >>>> > Tom
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Niels Basjes
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to
> create
> >>>> >>> a release candidate so we can vote on it.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are
> very
> >>>> >>> few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release
> 1.8.0
> >>>> >>> from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor
> >>>> >>> release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> http://s.apache.org/Cdt
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> http://s.apache.org/5ShO
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Thanks,
> >>>> >>> Tom
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Niels Basjes
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sean
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas Sanchez
>

Reply via email to