Thanks Niels. Comments inline. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > I would say go for the 1.8.0 > > Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for > this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility": > > - AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2 > ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools > compiled against hadoop2 ) > - AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8
I've committed both of these now. > > On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix' > choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included): > AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user code > more readable. I think this is a "won't fix" as it doesn't seem to produce any real increase in readability and could actually be confusing. Thanks, Tom > > Niels Basjes > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create >> a release candidate so we can vote on it. >> >> What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very >> few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0 >> from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor >> release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that? >> >> The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here: >> >> http://s.apache.org/Cdt >> >> And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here: >> >> http://s.apache.org/5ShO >> >> Thanks, >> Tom > > > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > > Niels Basjes
