I gave the archetype-based quickstart a try on as many runners and
configurations as I could manage today, mostly embedded and YARN.

There are some issues (filed and added to the doc) that may have to do with
my setup, but may not. I'd prefer the runner maintainers / system experts
try these on their more realistic setups.

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:

> I'm making sure the direct runner plays nice in a variety of scenarios
> (primarily the game examples, at the moment. Been a couple of hours and
> still going strong in streaming)
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Dan Halperin <dhalp...@google.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I'm focusing on:
> >
> > * user reported bugs (Avro, TextIO, MongoDb)
> > * the actual Apache Release criteria (licensing, dependencies, etc.)
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have been trying out various Python scenarios on Windows.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Jason Kuster <
> > > jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll try to get wordcount running against a Spark cluster.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just a quick remainder to consider to consider contributing here.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are now at 6 criteria -- thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > aljos...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for starting this document!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I added a criterion and also verified it on the current RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Aljoscha
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8. May 2017, at 22:48, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Based on the process previously discussed [1], I've seeded the
> > > > > acceptance
> > > > > > > criteria document [2].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please consider contributing to this effort by:
> > > > > > > * proposing additional acceptance criteria, and/or
> > > > > > > * supporting criteria proposed by others, and/or
> > > > > > > * validating a criteria.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please note that acceptance criteria shouldn't been too deep or
> > too
> > > > > broad
> > > > > > > -- those are covered by automated tests and hackathon we had
> > > earlier.
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > > should be "sanity-check"-type of criteria: simple,
> surface-level
> > > > > things.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you discover issues while validating a criteria, please:
> > > > > > > * file a new JIRA issue, tag it as Fix Versions: “2.0.0”, and
> > > > > > > * post on the dev@ mailing list on the thread about that
> > specific
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Davor
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > 37caa5a94cec1405638410857f489d
> > > > > > 7cf7fa12bbe3c36e9925b2d6e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> > 1XwojJ4Mj3wSlnBO1YlBs51P8kuGyg
> > > > > > YRj2lrNrqmAUvo/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -------
> > > > Jason Kuster
> > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to