The proposal makes sense. If the author of PR doesn't respond for 90 days, the PR is likely out of sync with current repo.
Cheers On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Do we have an existing policy for handling stale PRs? If not could we come > up with one. We are getting close to 100 open PRs. Some of the open PRs > have not been touched for a while, and if we exclude the pings the number > will be higher. > > For example, we could close PRs that have not been updated by the original > author for 90 days even after multiple attempts to reach them (e.g. [1], > [2] are such PRs.) > > What do you think? > > Thank you, > Ahmet > > [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1464 > [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2949 >
