If we consider the author, it makes sense. Regards JB
On Aug 15, 2017, 01:29, at 01:29, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >The proposal makes sense. > >If the author of PR doesn't respond for 90 days, the PR is likely out >of >sync with current repo. > >Cheers > >On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Do we have an existing policy for handling stale PRs? If not could we >come >> up with one. We are getting close to 100 open PRs. Some of the open >PRs >> have not been touched for a while, and if we exclude the pings the >number >> will be higher. >> >> For example, we could close PRs that have not been updated by the >original >> author for 90 days even after multiple attempts to reach them (e.g. >[1], >> [2] are such PRs.) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thank you, >> Ahmet >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1464 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2949 >>
