I think the JIRA should remain open and possibly become unassigned.

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What should be done to the JIRA associated with the PR?
> -------- Original message --------From: Ahmet Altay
> <al...@google.com.INVALID> Date: 8/16/17  12:05 PM  (GMT-08:00) To:
> dev@beam.apache.org Subject: Re: Policy for stale PRs
> Sounds like we have consensus. Since this is a new policy, I would suggest
> picking the most flexible option for now (90 days) and we can tighten it in
> the future. To answer Kenn's question, I do not know, how other projects
> handle this. I did a basic search but could not find a good answer.
>
> What mechanism can we use to close PRs, assuming that author will be out of
> communication. We can push a commit with a "This closes #xyz #abc" message.
> Is there another way to do this?
>
> Ahmet
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Aviem Zur <aviem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Makes sense to close after a long time of inactivity and no response, and
> > as Kenn mentioned they can always re-open.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:20 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If we consider the author, it makes sense.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Aug 15, 2017, 01:29, at 01:29, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >The proposal makes sense.
> > > >
> > > >If the author of PR doesn't respond for 90 days, the PR is likely out
> > > >of
> > > >sync with current repo.
> > > >
> > > >Cheers
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid
> >
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi all,
> > > >>
> > > >> Do we have an existing policy for handling stale PRs? If not could
> we
> > > >come
> > > >> up with one. We are getting close to 100 open PRs. Some of the open
> > > >PRs
> > > >> have not been touched for a while, and if we exclude the pings the
> > > >number
> > > >> will be higher.
> > > >>
> > > >> For example, we could close PRs that have not been updated by the
> > > >original
> > > >> author for 90 days even after multiple attempts to reach them (e.g.
> > > >[1],
> > > >> [2] are such PRs.)
> > > >>
> > > >> What do you think?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you,
> > > >> Ahmet
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1464
> > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2949
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to