So, is the release done now? Have both Java and Python artifacts been uploaded?
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017, 9:05 AM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Upload to PyPi done. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-beam > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> > wrote: > > I can do that. > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017, 11:13 PM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> > >> I am not an owner or maintainer of the PyPi package, so I'm not sure if > >> I'll be able to release Python artifacts. > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Awesome, Thanks Reuven ! > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > JB > >> > > >> > On 11/25/2017 07:01 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: > >> > > >> >> I'll go ahead and send the RESULT email right now. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> It's not sync: promoting the artifacts takes some time (at least 30 > >> >>> minutes). So, the artifacts will be on central after a certain time. > >> >>> > >> >>> I confirm that it's OK because now the artifacts are on Central: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/beam/beam-sdk > >> >>> s-java-core/2.2.0/ > >> >>> > >> >>> By the way, you are promoting the artifacts to Central but I didn't > >> >>> see > >> >>> any [RESULT] e-mail on the vote thread. You have first to close the > >> >>> vote, > >> >>> then promote the artifacts, announce the release, etc. > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards > >> >>> JB > >> >>> > >> >>> On 11/25/2017 12:43 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Appears to be a problem :) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to Maven > >> >>>> Central. > >> >>>> After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has > >> >>>> completed. > >> >>>> However a look at the Maven Central page ( > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core) > >> >>>> does not show 2.2.0 artifacts, and the staging repository has now > >> >>>> vanished > >> >>>> from the Nexus site! Does anyone know what happened here? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Reuven > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> +1 > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> It needed couple tweaks to get there though. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> <!-- > >> >>>>> Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat jar, > >> >>>>> the > >> >>>>> included version has to match what's on the cluster, > >> >>>>> hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop dependencies > at > >> >>>>> the > >> >>>>> required version here. > >> >>>>> --> > >> >>>>> <dependency> > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId> > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> > >> >>>>> </dependency> > >> >>>>> <dependency> > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId> > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> > >> >>>>> </dependency> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar org.apache.beam.examples. > >> >>>>> WordCount > >> >>>>> \ > >> >>>>> --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts > >> >>>>> --embeddedExecution=false > --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties > >> >>>>> --runner=ApexRunner > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* instead > >> >>>>> of > >> >>>>> *java* > >> >>>>> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build > >> >>>>> environment > >> >>>>> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <nishuta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi Eugene, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I ran it on both standalone flink(non Yarn) and Flink on > >> >>>>>> HDInsight > >> >>>>>> Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :) > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Regards, > >> >>>>>> Nishu > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> > >> >>>>>> Virus-free. > >> >>>>>> www.avast.com > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> > >> >>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > >> >>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines were > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> running > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> on > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), > and > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> validated > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> quickstart and game examples. > >> >>>>>>> At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink non-YARN [I > >> >>>>>>> think > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> if > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, > >> >>>>> combined > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> with > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], > and > >> >>>>>>> Apex > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not > validating > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Apex > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> on > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <nishuta...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Hi Eugene, > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom pipeline > >> >>>>>>>> where > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Kafka > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and > processing > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> time > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation i.e. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections. > >> >>>>>>>> I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark > runner > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> earlier.. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >> >>>>>>>> Nishu. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t > >> >>>>>>> erm=icon > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Virus-free. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> www.avast.com > >> >>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t > >> >>>>>>> erm=link > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > >> >>>>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were running? > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and 2) > >> >>>>>>>>> mobile > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> game > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline? > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu <nishuta...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Typo in previous mail. I meant Flink runner. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>> Nishu > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with runner on > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> yarn. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> issues > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> with > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> my pipeline so far :) > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,Nishu > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Who is validating Flink and Yarn? > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I understand > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> difference > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service". Which > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Dataproc? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster/service. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Does > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> count for both? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own > non-YARN > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> mode. I > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> would expect that the launching experience might be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> different > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> and > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> portable container management to differ. If they are > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> identical, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> experts > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Conversely, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> as > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> other > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms become supported, they could be added or not > based > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> whether > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> they are substantively different from a user experience or > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> QA > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> point > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> view. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verifications. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> partially > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> guess > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> to 5 > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> workers > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spark > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> runner > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> chose > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not to split the 10GB input files into chunks. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. You need to re-sign as well. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI these generated files have been removed from the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> distribution. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re...@google.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> the > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> zip > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> file > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> before > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending this email. Let me check again. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reuven > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The source distribution contains a couple of files > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> github > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folders that were added on master, Python > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> files). > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pom > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> that > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> presumably > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the source release should just be "wget > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> "? > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v pom.xml > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # OK? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Expected. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .git > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitignore > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # These folders are probably from switching around > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> master > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> git branches. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: examples > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jarstore > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gcp-core > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sketching > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file-based-io-tests > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples/src/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in/resources/archetype-resources: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples- > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> java8/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> microbenchmarks > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> # Here's the generated protos. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And some other sdist generated Python files. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably we should just purge these files from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> rc? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can I specify a dependency on the staged RC? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I'm > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> trying > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the quickstart per > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/get- > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started/quickstart-java/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> specifying > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> yet. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Should > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> version > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> from > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> staging > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lc...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its open to all, its just that there are > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> votes > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> non-binding > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a process question: is the vote open > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> committers > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> only > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lc...@google.com.invalid> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Approve the release > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the wordcount quickstart on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Apache > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Beam > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> website > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on Linux. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Gearpump runner is yet to have a > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickstart > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> listed > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> our > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the quickstart is already > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represented > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> by > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> this > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> existing > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/BEAM-2692 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> artifacts > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked Python side of the validation > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checklist > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Linux. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one known issue in UserScore > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> for > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Dataflow > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> runner. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue has been fixed on master branch and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> not > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> require a > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point. A workaround is to pass > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --save_main_session > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pipeline > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 looks good to me so far. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kenneth > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Knowles > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >
