Release instructions just show the "git tag" command for generating the new tag. However I'm assuming that I also need to push the new tag to the remote, right?
Reuven On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote: > Getting close. A few more steps left (source release, new git tag, merging > the website PR, and marking it as released in JIRA). > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Eugene Kirpichov < > kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> So, is the release done now? Have both Java and Python artifacts been >> uploaded? >> >> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017, 9:05 AM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com.invalid >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Upload to PyPi done. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-beam >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> >> > wrote: >> > > I can do that. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017, 11:13 PM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com.invalid> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I am not an owner or maintainer of the PyPi package, so I'm not sure >> if >> > >> I'll be able to release Python artifacts. >> > >> >> > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> j...@nanthrax.net >> > > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Awesome, Thanks Reuven ! >> > >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > JB >> > >> > >> > >> > On 11/25/2017 07:01 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> I'll go ahead and send the RESULT email right now. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> > j...@nanthrax.net> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> It's not sync: promoting the artifacts takes some time (at least >> 30 >> > >> >>> minutes). So, the artifacts will be on central after a certain >> time. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> I confirm that it's OK because now the artifacts are on Central: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/beam/beam-sdk >> > >> >>> s-java-core/2.2.0/ >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> By the way, you are promoting the artifacts to Central but I >> didn't >> > >> >>> see >> > >> >>> any [RESULT] e-mail on the vote thread. You have first to close >> the >> > >> >>> vote, >> > >> >>> then promote the artifacts, announce the release, etc. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Regards >> > >> >>> JB >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On 11/25/2017 12:43 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Appears to be a problem :) >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to >> Maven >> > >> >>>> Central. >> > >> >>>> After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has >> > >> >>>> completed. >> > >> >>>> However a look at the Maven Central page ( >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core) >> > >> >>>> does not show 2.2.0 artifacts, and the staging repository has >> now >> > >> >>>> vanished >> > >> >>>> from the Nexus site! Does anyone know what happened here? >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Reuven >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> +1 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN. >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> It needed couple tweaks to get there though. >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile: >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> <!-- >> > >> >>>>> Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat >> jar, >> > >> >>>>> the >> > >> >>>>> included version has to match what's on the cluster, >> > >> >>>>> hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop >> dependencies >> > at >> > >> >>>>> the >> > >> >>>>> required version here. >> > >> >>>>> --> >> > >> >>>>> <dependency> >> > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> >> > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId> >> > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> >> > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> >> > >> >>>>> </dependency> >> > >> >>>>> <dependency> >> > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> >> > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId> >> > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> >> > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> >> > >> >>>>> </dependency> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster: >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar >> org.apache.beam.examples. >> > >> >>>>> WordCount >> > >> >>>>> \ >> > >> >>>>> --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts >> > >> >>>>> --embeddedExecution=false >> > --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties >> > >> >>>>> --runner=ApexRunner >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path) >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* >> instead >> > >> >>>>> of >> > >> >>>>> *java* >> > >> >>>>> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build >> > >> >>>>> environment >> > >> >>>>> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster. >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <nishuta...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Hi Eugene, >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> I ran it on both standalone flink(non Yarn) and Flink on >> > >> >>>>>> HDInsight >> > >> >>>>>> Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :) >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Regards, >> > >> >>>>>> Nishu >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> >> > >> >>>>>> Virus-free. >> > >> >>>>>> www.avast.com >> > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> >> > >> >>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >> > >> >>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines >> were >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> running >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN? >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), >> > and >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> validated >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> quickstart and game examples. >> > >> >>>>>>> At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink >> non-YARN [I >> > >> >>>>>>> think >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> if >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, >> > >> >>>>> combined >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> with >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], >> > and >> > >> >>>>>>> Apex >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not >> > validating >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Apex >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time? >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <nishuta...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Hi Eugene, >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom >> pipeline >> > >> >>>>>>>> where >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Kafka >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and >> > processing >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> time >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation >> i.e. >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections. >> > >> >>>>>>>> I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark >> > runner >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> earlier.. >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn. >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >> >>>>>>>> Nishu. >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> < >> > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-e >> mail&utm_content=webmail&utm_t >> > >> >>>>>>> erm=icon >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Virus-free. >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> www.avast.com >> > >> >>>>>>>> < >> > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-e >> mail&utm_content=webmail&utm_t >> > >> >>>>>>> erm=link >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >> > >> >>>>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were >> running? >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and >> 2) >> > >> >>>>>>>>> mobile >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> game >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline? >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu < >> nishuta...@gmail.com> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Hi, >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Typo in previous mail. I meant Flink runner. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Nishu >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with >> runner on >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> yarn. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> issues >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> with >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> my pipeline so far :) >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,Nishu >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Who is validating Flink and Yarn? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I >> understand >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> difference >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service". >> Which >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Dataproc? >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster/service. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Does >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> count for both? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own >> > non-YARN >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> mode. I >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> would expect that the launching experience might be >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> different >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> and >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> portable container management to differ. If they are >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> identical, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> experts >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Conversely, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> as >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> other >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms become supported, they could be added or not >> > based >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> whether >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> they are substantively different from a user experience or >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> QA >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> point >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> of >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> view. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verifications. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore, >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> partially >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> I >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> guess >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> to 5 >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> workers >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spark >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> runner >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> chose >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not to split the 10GB input files into chunks. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw < >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. You need to re-sign as well. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <re...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI these generated files have been removed from the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> distribution. >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax < >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re...@google.com >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> zip >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> file >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> before >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending this email. Let me check again. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reuven >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw < >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The source distribution contains a couple of files >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> github >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folders that were added on master, Python >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> files). >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> The >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pom >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> that >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> presumably >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the source release should just be "wget >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> "? >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v pom.xml >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # OK? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Expected. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .git >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitignore >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # These folders are probably from switching >> around >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> master >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> git branches. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: >> examples >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jarstore >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gcp-core >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sketching >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file-based-io-tests >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples/src/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in/resources/archetype-resources: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples- >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> java8/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> microbenchmarks >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> # Here's the generated protos. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And some other sdist generated Python files. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably we should just purge these files from >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> rc? >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can I specify a dependency on the staged RC? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> I'm >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> trying >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the quickstart per >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/get- >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started/quickstart-java/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> and >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> specifying >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> yet. >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Should >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> version >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> from >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> staging >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lc...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its open to all, its just that there are >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> votes >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> and >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> non-binding >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> < >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a process question: is the vote open >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> committers >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> only >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors? >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lc...@google.com.invalid> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Approve the release >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the wordcount quickstart on >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Apache >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Beam >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> website >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on Linux. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Gearpump runner is yet to have a >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickstart >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> listed >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> our >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the quickstart is already >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represented >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> by >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> this >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> existing >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/BEAM-2692 >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev < >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> valen...@google.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> artifacts >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], and >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked Python side of the validation >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checklist >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> on >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> Linux. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one known issue in UserScore >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> for >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Dataflow >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> runner. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue has been fixed on master branch and >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> not >> > >> >>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> require a >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point. A workaround is to pass >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --save_main_session >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pipeline >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 looks good to me so far. >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kenneth >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Knowles >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
