+1 for cutting the release branch and merging in any necessary PRs. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:33 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> JB said that he is looking at it ( > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1e329318a4dafe27b9ff304d9460d05d8966e5ceebaf4ebfb948e2b8@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > ) > > I propose cutting the release branch as proposed (July 17); and applying > any fixes related to the issue to the branch. > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Checking once more: >> What does the communitythink we should do about >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4750 ? Should I bump it to >> 2.7.0? >> Best >> -P. >> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Update: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4784 is not a >>> release blocker, details in the JIRA issue. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Can one of our Python experts please take a look at >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4784 and advise if this >>>> should be addressed for the release? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:02 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> I've triaged most issues marked for 2.6.0 release. I've localized two >>>>>> that need a decision / attention: >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4417 - Bigquery IO >>>>>> Numeric Datatype Support. Cham is not available to fix this at the >>>>>> moment, >>>>>> but this is a critical issue. Is anyone able to tackle this / should we >>>>>> bump this to next release? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I bumped this to the next release. I think Cham will be the best >>>>> person to address it when he is back. And with the regular release >>>>> cadence, >>>>> it would not be delayed by much. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4750 - Performance >>>>>> degradation due to some safeguards in beam-sdks-java-core. JB, are you >>>>>> looking to fix this? Should we bump? I had the impression that it was an >>>>>> easy fix, but I'm not sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you're aware of any other issue that needs to be included as a >>>>>> release blocker, please report it to me. >>>>>> Best >>>>>> -P. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:15 AM Etienne Chauchot < >>>>>> echauc...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering Pablo, thanks also to have caught tickets >>>>>>> that I forgot to close :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Etienne >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mercredi 11 juillet 2018 à 12:55 -0700, Alan Myrvold a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 Thanks for volunteering, Pablo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:49 AM Jason Kuster < >>>>>>> jasonkus...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 sounds great >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering, Pablo! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I planned to send the proposal as well ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/07/2018 23:16, Pablo Estrada wrote: >>>>>>> > Hello everyone! >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > As per the previously agreed-upon schedule for Beam releases, the >>>>>>> > process for the 2.6.0 Beam release should start on July 17th. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I volunteer to perform this release. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Here is the schedule that I have in mind: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > - We start triaging JIRA issues this week. >>>>>>> > - I will cut a release branch on July 17. >>>>>>> > - After July 17, any blockers will need to be cherry-picked into >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> > release branch. >>>>>>> > - As soon as tests look good, and blockers have been addressed, I >>>>>>> will >>>>>>> > perform the other release tasks. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Does that seem reasonable to the community? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Best >>>>>>> > -P. >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback >>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback >>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback >> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> >> > >
