Hello all! I've cut the release branch (release-2.6.0), with some help from Ahmet and Boyuan. From now on, please cherry-pick 2.6.0 blockers into the branch. Now we start stabilizing it.
Thanks! -P. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > I'm investigating this issue, but it's a little long process. > > So, I propose you start with the release process, cutting the branch, > and then, I will create a cherry-pick PR for this one. > > Regards > JB > > On 17/07/2018 20:19, Pablo Estrada wrote: > > Checking once more: > > What does the communitythink we should do > > about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4750 ? Should I bump it > > to 2.7.0? > > Best > > -P. > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com > > <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > Update: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4784 is not a > > release blocker, details in the JIRA issue. > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org > > <mailto:t...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > Can one of our Python experts please take a look > > at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4784 and advise if > > this should be addressed for the release? > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:02 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com > > <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Pablo Estrada > > <pabl...@google.com <mailto:pabl...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I've triaged most issues marked for 2.6.0 release. I've > > localized two that need a decision / attention: > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4417 - > > Bigquery IO Numeric Datatype Support. Cham is not > > available to fix this at the moment, but this is a > > critical issue. Is anyone able to tackle this / should > > we bump this to next release? > > > > > > I bumped this to the next release. I think Cham will be the > > best person to address it when he is back. And with the > > regular release cadence, it would not be delayed by much. > > > > > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4750 - > > Performance degradation due to some safeguards in > > beam-sdks-java-core. JB, are you looking to fix this? > > Should we bump? I had the impression that it was an easy > > fix, but I'm not sure. > > > > If you're aware of any other issue that needs to be > > included as a release blocker, please report it to me. > > Best > > -P. > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:15 AM Etienne Chauchot > > <echauc...@apache.org <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>> > wrote: > > > > +1, > > > > Thanks for volunteering Pablo, thanks also to have > > caught tickets that I forgot to close :) > > > > Etienne > > > > Le mercredi 11 juillet 2018 à 12:55 -0700, Alan > > Myrvold a écrit : > >> +1 Thanks for volunteering, Pablo > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:49 AM Jason Kuster > >> <jasonkus...@google.com > >> <mailto:jasonkus...@google.com>> wrote: > >>> +1 sounds great > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:06 AM Thomas Weise > >>> <t...@apache.org <mailto:t...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for volunteering, Pablo! > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:56 PM Jean-Baptiste > >>>> Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > >>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> I planned to send the proposal as well ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>> On 09/07/2018 23:16, Pablo Estrada wrote: > >>>>> > Hello everyone! > >>>>> > > >>>>> > As per the previously agreed-upon schedule > >>>>> for Beam releases, the > >>>>> > process for the 2.6.0 Beam release should > >>>>> start on July 17th. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I volunteer to perform this release. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Here is the schedule that I have in mind: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > - We start triaging JIRA issues this week. > >>>>> > - I will cut a release branch on July 17. > >>>>> > - After July 17, any blockers will need to be > >>>>> cherry-picked into the > >>>>> > release branch. > >>>>> > - As soon as tests look good, and blockers > >>>>> have been addressed, I will > >>>>> > perform the other release tasks. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Does that seem reasonable to the community? > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Best > >>>>> > -P. > >>>>> > -- > >>>>> > Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback > <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> > >>>>> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>> jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >>> > > -- > > Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback > <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> > > <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> > > > > > > > > -- > > Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback > <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback