I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current release is already pretty massive. Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The > nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the > next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release > cadence. > > On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we > > are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest > > cutting an RC rather soon. > > > > I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't > > see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets > > that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to > > gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release. > > > > If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please > > let me know. > > > > As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025. > > How do you feel about this timeline? > > > > Best, > > Stamatis > > > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello everyone, > >> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the > >> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica > upgrade). > >> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind? > >> > >> Best, > >> Ruben > >> > >> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/ > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started > >>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and > >>> what not. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Stamatis > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on > Avatica > >>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include > an > >>>> upgrade to said Avatica version). > >>>> > >>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers > should > >>> be: > >>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis > >>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo > >>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang > >>>> > >>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for > >>>> 1.39.0? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Ruben > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang < > [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months > >>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting > most > >>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the > >>> latest > >>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0 > >>>>> > >>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote: > >>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM > >>>>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024) > >>> and > >>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time > to > >>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see > release > >>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to > include > >>>>>> in the release? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one > of > >>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do > we > >>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Stamatis > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >
