On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Claus, > > +1, > > I guess that we could merge some fixes in this release (for instance, the > xstream 1.4.1 update, etc).WDYT ? >
I would actually discourage against bigger dependency updates such as xstream 1.3 -> 1.4. There was already some issues in xstream 1.4 so they had to do a 1.4.1. However if there is an update like groovy 1.8.0 -> 1.8.1 we may consider that. Likewise I guess possible CXF 2.4.1 -> 2.4.2 But yeah we should go over the JIRA tickets which has been fixed for 2.9 and backport bug fixes which can be easily backported. > I will update ServiceMix to include Camel 2.8.1. > > Regards > JB > > On 08/25/2011 09:58 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Its been 1 month since Camel 2.8.0 was released. >> And we have a 2.8 branch where we have merged bug fixes. >> >> I suggest that we consider doing a 2.8.1 release in the near term, for >> example in about 1 - 2 weeks. >> >> Apache ActiveMQ 5.6.0 is upgrading to Apache Camel 2.8.x. And as we >> have a bug fixed in 2.8.1, I would love that AMQ could upgrade and use >> 2.8.1 instead of 2.8.0. >> >> Likewise SMX 4.4 is to be released with Camel 2.8.0. And I guess it >> would be great if SMX included 2.8.1. >> There is not so often a new SMX release so it would be good if we >> included an as most bug free version of 2.8 which would be 2.8.1 >> release. >> >> Any feedback? >> >> >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
