On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 13:46 -0600, Tyler Hobbs wrote: >> Personally, I like the Mongo drivers page: >> http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Drivers >> >> I like the clear distinction between preferred and alternative clients >> without a lot of clutter about release dates and supported versions. >> How do we make that distinction, though? A "supported by Riptano" >> section is one option, but that doesn't even encompass all of the >> preferred clients. > This sounds like you're suggesting that we place an "official according > to Riptano" section on the project wiki. That sounds... worse.
The PMC can sort it out, but I don't think it's within the purview/charter of the project to bless third-party libraries. For libraries/content that are shipped with officially Apache artifacts, there are clear and specific standards in terms of licenses, intellectual property, etc., and endorsing (versus simply listing) third-party components on a project site is probably inappropriate. (IMHO.) What happens on a third party's site is another matter. -- Paul
