Thanks for coordinating this Josh.  Having professional doc writers
contributing regularly to the official docs will be an awesome improvement
to the project.  I am definitely looking forward to working with everyone
on this!

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:28 PM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
wrote:

> >
> > could be some duplication.
>
> Absolutely. I was unclear in my original email: this is offered as a
> contribution in whatever form best works for the project, and there's
> plenty of exceptionally good documentation and work that's already been
> done in-tree. The path forward would likely look like taking some pages
> wholesale, merging some in with existing content, and ignoring some
> entirely which I would leave up to the contributors involved as I haven't
> worked on docs in a few years. No plan to steamroll or flatten, all plans
> to offer to the community what we want in-tree and in what form and nothing
> more.
>
> Any further questions or comments, don't hesitate. I'm positive there's
> other things I inadequately covered in that original email.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:39 PM Deepak Vohra <dvohr...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >  Joshua,
> > That sounds good. But could be some duplication.
> > regards,Deepak
> >     On Friday, April 24, 2020, 04:17:07 p.m. UTC, Joshua McKenzie <
> > jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >  To clarify intent Deepak, we're only talking about donating the Apache
> > Cassandra portion of the documentation, nothing else. There is no
> > intention whatsoever for anything DataStax branded or related to merge
> into
> > the in-tree project documentation.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:33 AM Deepak Vohra <dvohr...@yahoo.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > While the DataStax documentation could supplement the Apache Cassandra
> > > documentation, DataStax is a commercial product based on open source
> > Apache
> > > Cassandra with enhancements made to the  open source Cassandra.
> Moreover,
> > > DataStax documentation requires to be maintained and updated and as it
> is
> > > the documentation has not been updated to version 4.0.
> > > thanks,Deepak    On Friday, April 24, 2020, 03:11:26 p.m. UTC, Joshua
> > > McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >  All,
> > >
> > > A few of us have the opportunity to offer a large portion of
> > documentation
> > > to the apache foundation and specifically the Apache Cassandra project
> as
> > > well as dedicate a good portion of time to maintaining this going
> > forward.
> > > For those of you familiar, this is the DataStax sponsored / authored
> > > Cassandra documentation people often refer to in the community. Links
> can
> > > be found here
> > > <
> >
> https://docs.datastax.com/en/landing_page/doc/landing_page/cassandra.html
> > > >.
> > >
> > > I've spoken with some of the doc writers and there's going to be
> > > significant work involved to go from the doc writing system these are
> > > authored in to Sphinx, or some other doc authoring system if we as a
> > > project decide to switch things. I know Jon Haddad has some opinions
> here
> > > and I think that'd be a great conversation to have on this thread for
> > those
> > > interested. A couple of people in the near future are going to have the
> > > opportunity to continue working on these docs full-time in the in-tree
> > > docs, so maintenance going forward should represent little disruption
> to
> > > the project's workings day-to-day.
> > >
> > > Looking for feedback on:
> > >
> > >  1.
> > >
> > >  Are there any questions or concerns about this donation?
> > >  2.
> > >
> > >  Any thoughts on documentation system to use long-term, since a
> donation
> > >  of this size would be a reasonable time to consider switching to
> > > something
> > >  more preferable (not advocating for the system these current docs are
> in
> > > to
> > >  be clear - poking Haddad to speak up since he has a strong PoV here
> ;) )
> > >  3.
> > >
> > >  What are next steps?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm genuinely excited about this; here's to hoping everyone else is
> too!
> > >
> > >
> > > ~Josh
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to