+0 I realize this is a vote thread and I am late for feedback but I wanted to point out a couple things:
1. How/Who/Where are we planning to deal with Code of Conduct violations? I assume this should be private@ but the document does not call it out as such. We should call it out explicitly as part of the PMC responsibilities. We should also clarify how and where are CoC violations against PMC members reported and handled? Should they go to ASF? 2. Regarding vetos, I see we're aligning on ASF principles. Using -1s in a discussion or debate is very unproductive therefore we should explicitly call out that vetos (or threat of a veto) should not be used in any discussion. It should only be issued per the ASF guidelines[1]. 3. Discussion #3 - "... 1 business day notice period." Whose business day is it? US? Europe? Australia? NZ? We are a distributed community and so 1 business day is ambiguous. ASF typically states a 48-72 hour period which gives enough time to cover everyone in the community. We want to avoid people getting disenfranchised due to their location. I propose we make this longer and avoid using 'business day' language. Thanks, Dinesh [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto > On Jun 24, 2020, at 2:59 PM, sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:37 AM Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (b) >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:59 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> A reminder: this vote will close at midnight PST today in roughly 17 >> hours. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:20 PM J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non-binding >>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Stefan Podkowinski <s...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>>> On 22.06.20 20:12, Blake Eggleston wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Joshua McKenzie < >> jmcken...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Link to doc: >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Change since previous cancelled vote: >>>>>>> "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for >>>> votes >>>>>>> in favour necessary to pass a motion, with new PMC members added to >>> the >>>>>>> calculation." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This previously read "super majority". We have lowered the low >> water >>>> mark >>>>>>> to "simple majority" to balance strong consensus against risk of >>> stall >>>> due >>>>>>> to low participation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Vote will run through 6/24/20 >>>>>>> - pmc votes considered binding >>>>>>> - simple majority of binding participants passes the vote >>>>>>> - committer and community votes considered advisory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lastly, I propose we take the count of pmc votes in this thread as >>> our >>>>>>> initial roll call count for electorate numbers and low watermark >>>>>>> calculation on subsequent votes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks again everyone (and specifically Benedict and Jon) for the >>> time >>>> and >>>>>>> collaboration on this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ~Josh >>>>>> >>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://twitter.com/tjake >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
