So to be clear for future UI merges does the following makes sense
* For pure UI features we need a separate proposal email
* If UI is part of a specific feature, the functional spec should call out the 
UI changes and UI merge request should reference the original feature proposal. 
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sonny Chhen; Jessica Wang; Pranav Saxena; Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Mixed zone management
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:44PM -0700, Brian Federle wrote:
> > I'll have to dig through my e-mail, since this feature was proposed a while
> ago (>3 months) so may not have been formally introduced...
> 
> OK, let's consider this that discussion then.  I already searched and can't 
> find
> anything.  Let's move on though.
> 
> Reading through the FS, it seems to make sense to me.  I'm +1 on this merge.
> 
> I get that we were a moving target for "what to do", so thanks for trying to
> keep up Brian!
> 
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:29 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Sonny Chhen; Jessica Wang; Pranav Saxena; Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE] Mixed zone management
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:26:15PM -0700, Brian Federle wrote:
> > > [Revised to follow proper format]
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to merge the feature 'mixed zone management' to master.
> > >
> > > JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2038,
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-738
> > > FS:
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Mixed+Zone+Ma
> > > nagement
> > > Branch: ui-mixed-zone-management
> > > Unit tests: No new unit tests (UI only)
> >
> > I guess we never discussed this on the list?
> >

Reply via email to