> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:52 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:11 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> On the rapid influx of fixes, I don't think that we should tell
> > >> people to stop pushing fixes into 4.2, but we also want to minimize
> > churn.
> > >> Animesh and I were discussing this in person yesterday and I wonder
> > >> if we should branch 4.2 temporarily (perhaps call it 4.2-forward)
> > >> stabilize the 4.2 branch,  let folks push their non-blocker
> > >> bugfixes into 4.2-forward and merge 4.2-forward back into 4.2 after
> release.
> > >> The alternative is telling people to push fixes into master - which
> > >> means someone has to go back and cherry-pick, and know what needs
> > >> to be cherry- picked, and deal with inevitable conflict.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I've been pushing this with Animesh as well.  This is basically a
> > staging branch for 4.2.  Commits don't get cherry-pick over until the
> > staging branch passed BVT.  At this stage, I'm not sure it has much
> > value unless we see that 4.2 release will stretch out much further.
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps we should rethink how we lock down the release branch after
> > 'code freeze' and do something more along this line. We wouldn't
> > necessarily slow down velocity, but it would still allow the RM to
> > cherry-pick fixes in.
> > I don't think we realistically know how long it will take. 3 days? 3
> > weeks? That said, we have people working on fixing bugs, things that
> > we'd probably like to see in 4.2.1 that need a place to live.
> 
> [Animesh>] Yes my preference would also be to keep this staging or 4.2-
> forward branch where we can continue our bug fixes. Newer Issues can be
> tagged for fixVersion 4.2.1. I will continually triage and pull over the
> ones we need for 4.2.
> 
[Animesh>] Another update is doc and translations are running behind schedule 
and may take another 2-3 days to settle. Given the separate thread from David 
on "breaking docs out" I would not consider this blocking first RC.
> 
> 
> >
> > > Due to my changes on master, cherry-picking between master and 4.2
> > will not be easy.  I wouldn't recommend for fixes to sit on master and
> > wait for cherry-pick to 4.2.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed.

Reply via email to