OK, thanks Joris. I will try playing with OS version option, on the systemvm-kvm-4.3 template...
Let me know if I can help with anything more. Thanks. Andrija On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout <jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can see "<type > arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS well enough > to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting the VR > started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I do see > patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully... > > The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java code, is this: > > 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver] > (agentRequest-Handler-3:) nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged] > 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] > (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command: > com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand > 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG > [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > Executing: > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0 > > My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the nic profile to > the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic id and > returns null. > > Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is where we might > need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the code. :) > > > Kind regards, > Joris van Lieshout > > Schuberg Philis > Boeingavenue 271 > 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk > schubergphilis.com > > +31 20-7506672 > +31 6-51428188 > > > > > On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hi Joris, > > > >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net host: > > > >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9 > >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC > > > >Not playing smart, but there is some error: > >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper] > >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest os: Debian > >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit) > > > >Best, > >Andrija > > > > > >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout <jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com > > > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Andrija, > >> > >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :) > >> But u might need a bit more info. > >> > >> At a certain point I see this line > >> > >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 1-609104082: Sending { > >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags: > >>100111, > >> > >>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM"... > >> > >> > >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent handles. For XS > >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management server but for > >>KVM, > >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the cloudstack > >>agent > >> service on the hypervisor. > >> > >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor executing the > >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search top down for > >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from the agent > >> handler thread started by that sequence. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Joris van Lieshout > >> > >> Schuberg Philis > >> Boeingavenue 271 > >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk > >> schubergphilis.com > >> > >> +31 20-7506672 > >> +31 6-51428188 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi Joris, > >> > > >> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk > >> > > >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold > >> > > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync inspecting src > >>type > >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612: Sending > >>{ > >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags: > >> 100011, > >> > >>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apa > >>>ch > >> > >>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0 > >>>b4 > >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":" > >> > > >> > >> > http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas > >>t > >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2 > >> > >>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"QCOW2 > >>>", > >> >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff"," > >> >*hvm":true* > >> > >>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudsta > >>>ck > >> > >>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-2203f79 > >>>b1 > >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":" > >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD:// > >> > > >> > >> > cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8 > >>8 > >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6 > >> > >>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorType" > >>>:" > >> > >>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uui > >>>d" > >> > >>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore": > >>>{" > >> > >>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1 > >>>a6 > >> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":" > >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD:// > >> > > >> > >> > cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8 > >>8 > >> > >>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":1064," > >>>vm > >> > >>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":0,"h > >>>yp > >> >ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}] > >> >} > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612: Processing: { Ans: , > >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, > >> > >>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{"org > >>>.a > >> > >>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path":"9 > >>>c4 > >> > >>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id":0}} > >>>," > >> >result":true,"wait":0}}] > >> >} > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612: > >>Received: { > >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { > >>CopyCmdAnswer > >> >} } > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG > >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic NicProfile[ > >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type Public from the > >> >nics > >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG > >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic > >> > >>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vlan:/ > >>>/4 > >> >4 > >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged > >> >later > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG > >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic > >> > >>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vlan:/ > >>>/4 > >> >3 > >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged > >> >later > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG > >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic > >> > >>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vlan:/ > >>>/3 > >> >004 > >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged > >> >later > >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG > >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic > >> > >>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vlan:/ > >>>/3 > >> >004 > >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start > >> > > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> > > >> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout > >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com > >> > > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Andrija, > >> >> > >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient. > >> >> > >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> Joris van Lieshout > >> >> > >> >> Schuberg Philis > >> >> Boeingavenue 271 > >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk > >> >> schubergphilis.com > >> >> > >> >> +31 20-7506672 > >> >> +31 6-51428188 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Hi Joris, > >> >> > > >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the moment I > >> >>reboot > >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log, and > >> >>start it > >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ? > >> >> > > >> >> >Thanks, > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout > >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com > >> >> > > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different so > >> >>PV/HVM is > >> >> >> not the issue. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I noted that > >>the > >> >>VR > >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be up. > >>This > >> >> >>raises > >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1. The ACS > >> >>management > >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the road where > >>ACS > >> >> >>gives > >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would capture the > >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand till the > >> >>exception, > >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might need to reed > >>into > >> >> >>the > >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a clue. The thing > >>is > >> >> >>that I > >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I cannot point > >>you > >> >>to > >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is > >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e) > >> >>Created a > >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1" > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Hi Deen, > >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value "untagged" - that > >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used in API call > >>(or > >> >> >> >better > >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server logs). > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Best, > >> >> >> >Andrija > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Andrija, > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one like > >>that > >> >>and > >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I am > >> >>wondering > >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think that is > >>the > >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your db? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic > >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue :) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > So...: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank for CEPH > >> >> >>support), > >> >> >> >>OS > >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled. > >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine > >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :) > >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64 > >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian 7 x64 > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was ofcourse > >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2 > >> >> >> >> - > >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this should not be > >>the > >> >> >> >>issues > >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" = all SVMs > >>are on > >> >> >>CEPH > >> >> >> >>- > >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to make some new > >> >> >>System > >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I did, I also > >>have > >> >> >>done > >> >> >> >>same > >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System Offering as > >>default > >> >>- > >> >> >> >>which > >> >> >> >> is > >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use "Change > >>Offering..." > >> >> >>button > >> >> >> >>on > >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs... > >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1... > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content is folowing > >>at > >> >>the > >> >> >> >> moment > >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline > >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal dns1=8.8.8.8 > dns2= > >> >> >> >> template=domP > >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75 eth0mask=255.255.0.0 > >> >> >>type=vpcrouter > >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP info, eth0 > >> >> >>(control > >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used for Tiers > >>get IP > >> >> >>info > >> >> >> >> fine. > >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public NIC) and start > >> >>ifup > >> >> >> >>eth1 - > >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port Forwarding etc does > >> >>not > >> >> >> >>work... > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my "Public" > >>network > >> >> >>(in > >> >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT tagged > >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)... > >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is the VR used > >>in > >> >> >>Shared > >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP range (also > >> >> >>efectively > >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP range from > >>untagged > >> >>to > >> >> >> >>vlan > >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there is any way at > >>all > >> >> >> >>(editing > >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not work, after > >> >> >>rebooting > >> >> >> >>VR > >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui). > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > :) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for 4.4, but right > >> >>now, > >> >> >>I'm > >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not operational at > >> >> >>all... > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout < > >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> > >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija, > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking at you > >> >> >>issue I > >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then when > >>upgrading > >> >> >>4.2.1 > >> >> >> >>to > >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build svm > >> >>template. > >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before explaining what the > >>cause > >> >> >>was > >> >> >> >>in > >> >> >> >> our > >> >> >> >> >> case. :) > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using? > >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised instance (PV) or > >> >> >>hardware > >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the VR uuid and > >> >>check > >> >> >>that > >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is unset. > >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS (guest_os_id in > >> >>vm_instance > >> >> >> >>table > >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os) > >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :) > >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was not > >>supported > >> >>on > >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the VR was > >>started > >> >>by > >> >> >>XS > >> >> >> >>as > >> >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the arguments passed to > >> >>them > >> >> >>in > >> >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in > >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline > >> >> >> >>which in > >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order to work. > >>cmdline > >> >> >> >>contains > >> >> >> >> the > >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information. > >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as a HVM it will > >>not > >> >> >>get > >> >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs. > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Workaround > >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I know editing > >>the > >> >>DB > >> >> >>is > >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is no other way > >>in > >> >>this > >> >> >> >>case) > >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the systemvmtemplate to > >>something > >> >> >> >>supported > >> >> >> >> by > >> >> >> >> >> XenServer. > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com > > > >> >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is both > >> >>tagged > >> >> >>vlan > >> >> >> >> 500, > >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and over > >> >>eth1 > >> >> >>to > >> >> >> >> outside > >> >> >> >> >> >world)... > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland > >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two > >> >> >>physical > >> >> >> >>nets > >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong). > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic > >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the > >> >> >>second > >> >> >> >> half is > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags, > >>that > >> >>is > >> >> >> >> untagged > >> >> >> >> >> >> packets) > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over physical > >> >>eth1 > >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet. > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland > >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija Panic < > >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500 > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your physical > >> >> >>network? > >> >> >> >> You > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500! > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >-- > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić > >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com > >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić > >> >> >> >> > -------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com > >> >> >> >> > -------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> Daan > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >-- > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić > >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com > >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >-- > >> >> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić > >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> > http://admintweets.com > >> >> >-------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> > > >> >Andrija Panić > >> >-------------------------------------- > >> > http://admintweets.com > >> >-------------------------------------- > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > > > >Andrija Panić > >-------------------------------------- > > http://admintweets.com > >-------------------------------------- > > -- Andrija Panić -------------------------------------- http://admintweets.com --------------------------------------