I thinnk the commit that caused the change was this or related to it. Is
there any way you could test a fix? Do you need me to build 4.3 RPMs or can
I just provide a patch? What works for you?

commit 53d09c6f1843f04c5f1ab76be9419f5584302d1e
Date:   Mon Aug 5 11:52:40 2013 +0200

    uri code per broadcast/isolation type , default is to accept anything
as uri , vlan and lswitch need some extra tlc



On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
>
> {
>     "com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand": {
>         "nic": {
>             "deviceId": 1,
>             "networkRateMbps": 99999,
>             "defaultNic": true,
>             "uuid": "6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff",
>             "ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>             "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>             "gateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>             "mac": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>             "broadcastType": "Vlan",
>             "type": "Public",
>             "broadcastUri": "vlan://untagged",
>             "isolationUri": "vlan://untagged",
>             "isSecurityGroupEnabled": false,
>             "name": "breth1-500"
>         },
>         "instanceName": "r-801-VM",
>         "vmType": "DomainRouter",
>         "wait": 0
>     }
> }
>
> and here is your ip associate command:
>
> {
>     "com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand": {
>         "ipAddresses": [
>             {
>                 "accountId": 11,
>                 "publicIp": "46.232.xxx.246",
>                 "sourceNat": true,
>                 "add": true,
>                 "oneToOneNat": false,
>                 "firstIP": false,
>                 "broadcastUri": "untagged",
>                 "vlanGateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>                 "vlanNetmask": "255.255.255.0",
>                 "vifMacAddress": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>                 "networkRate": 99999,
>                 "trafficType": "Public",
>                 "networkName": "breth1-500"
>             }
>         ],
>         "accessDetails": {
>             "router.guest.ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>             "zone.network.type": "Advanced",
>             "router.name": "r-801-VM",
>             "router.ip": "169.254.0.52"
>         },
>         "wait": 0
>     }
> }
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
>> configuration...
>>
>>
>> On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as it
>> > seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to
>> work?
>> > If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in
>> BridgeVifDriver or
>> > the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
>> >
>> > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52  -A  -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
>> > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM, but still
>> > > doesn't work...
>> > > Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
>> > >
>> > > $ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
>> > >  ...
>> > > <description>Debian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)</description>
>> > > ...
>> > > <os>
>> > >     <type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'>hvm</type>
>> > >     <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>> > >     <boot dev='hd'/>
>> > >   </os>
>> > >
>> > > :(
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
>> > > >
>> > > > Per docs
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
>> > > > , you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for system-kvm-4.3
>> > > template...
>> > > > (same for xen and vmware templatest)
>> > > >
>> > > > Will change now DB to point to debian 5, and let you know.
>> > > >
>> > > > This is guest_os_id:          184 |           2 | NULL |
>> > > > 986a0e98-39d6-11e3-8f93-0025904e4412 | Debian GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 30 May 2014 15:45, Joris van Lieshout <
>> > > jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Andrija,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There
>> must
>> > > be
>> > > >> a way to list supported os types.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3)
>> > and I
>> > > >> don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
>> > > >> guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
>> > > >>
>> > > >> What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72
>> (Debian
>> > 5
>> > > >> 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template
>> (where
>> > > >> type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >Joris,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not
>> sure
>> > > how
>> > > >> >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to
>> > > define
>> > > >> >it
>> > > >> >as another OS type... ?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >Thanks again,
>> > > >> >Andrija
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <
>> > > >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>> > > >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at
>> > > >> BridgeVifDriver.java
>> > > >> >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is
>> generated)
>> > you
>> > > >> >>can
>> > > >> >> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS hits
>> the
>> > > >> >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to
>> believer
>> > > that
>> > > >> >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing
>> > that
>> > > >> >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> >OK, thanks Joris.
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the
>> systemvm-kvm-4.3
>> > > >> >> >template...
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >Thanks.
>> > > >> >> >Andrija
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can
>> see
>> > > >> >>"<type
>> > > >> >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS
>> > well
>> > > >> >>enough
>> > > >> >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting
>> > the
>> > > VR
>> > > >> >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand
>> I
>> > do
>> > > >> see
>> > > >> >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java
>> code,
>> > is
>> > > >> >>this:
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG
>> > [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>> > > >> >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
>> > > >> >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>> > > >> >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>> > > >> >> >> Executing:
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
>> > > >> >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52  -A  -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c
>> ethnull -g
>> > > >> >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the
>> nic
>> > > >> >>profile
>> > > >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic
>> id
>> > > and
>> > > >> >> >> returns null.
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is
>> > where
>> > > we
>> > > >> >> >>might
>> > > >> >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of
>> the
>> > > code.
>> > > >> >>:)
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> > > >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> > > >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>> > > >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net
>> host:
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
>> > > >> >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
>> > > >> >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
>> > > >> >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest
>> os:
>> > > >> Debian
>> > > >> >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >Best,
>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> > > >> >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>> 1-609104082:
>> > > >> >>Sending
>> > > >> >> >> {
>> > > >> >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver:
>> v1,
>> > > >> Flags:
>> > > >> >> >> >>100111,
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
>> > > >> >>>>>>".
>> > > >> >> >>>>..
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent
>> > > handles.
>> > > >> >>For
>> > > >> >> >>XS
>> > > >> >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management
>> server
>> > > but
>> > > >> >>for
>> > > >> >> >> >>KVM,
>> > > >> >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the
>> > > >> >>cloudstack
>> > > >> >> >> >>agent
>> > > >> >> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor
>> > > >> >>executing
>> > > >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search
>> top
>> > > down
>> > > >> >>for
>> > > >> >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from
>> the
>> > > >> >>agent
>> > > >> >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> > > >> >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> > > >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <
>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
>> > > >> >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync
>> > > inspecting
>> > > >> >>src
>> > > >> >> >> >>type
>> > > >> >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>> > 4-1248669612:
>> > > >> >> >>Sending
>> > > >> >> >> >>{
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver:
>> v1,
>> > > >> >>Flags:
>> > > >> >> >> >> 100011,
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
>> > > >> >>>>>>>.a
>> > > >> >> >>>>>pa
>> > > >> >> >> >>>ch
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
>> > > >> >>>>>>>f-
>> > > >> >> >>>>>b0
>> > > >> >> >> >>>b4
>> > > >> >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
>> > > >> >> >> >>t
>> > > >> >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
>> > > >> >>>>>>>CO
>> > > >> >> >>>>>W2
>> > > >> >> >> >>>",
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
>> > > >> >> >> >> >*hvm":true*
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
>> > > >> >>>>>>>ds
>> > > >> >> >>>>>ta
>> > > >> >> >> >>>ck
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
>> > > >> >>>>>>>3f
>> > > >> >> >>>>>79
>> > > >> >> >> >>>b1
>> > > >> >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>> > > >> >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
>> > > >> >>>>>>>yp
>> > > >> >> >>>>>e"
>> > > >> >> >> >>>:"
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
>> > > >> >>>>>>>"u
>> > > >> >> >>>>>ui
>> > > >> >> >> >>>d"
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
>> > > >> >>>>>>>re
>> > > >> >> >>>>>":
>> > > >> >> >> >>>{"
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
>> > > >> >>>>>>>2e
>> > > >> >> >>>>>-1
>> > > >> >> >> >>>a6
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
>> > > >> >>>>>>>64
>> > > >> >> >>>>>,"
>> > > >> >> >> >>>vm
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
>> > > >> >>>>>>>0,
>> > > >> >> >>>>>"h
>> > > >> >> >> >>>yp
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
>> > > >> >>>>>]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612:
>> Processing:
>> > >  {
>> > > >> >> >>Ans: ,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
>> > > >> >>>>>>>"o
>> > > >> >> >>>>>rg
>> > > >> >> >> >>>.a
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
>> > > >> >>>>>>>":
>> > > >> >> >>>>>"9
>> > > >> >> >> >>>c4
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
>> > > >> >>>>>>>:0
>> > > >> >> >>>>>}}
>> > > >> >> >> >>>,"
>> > > >> >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>> > 4-1248669612:
>> > > >> >> >> >>Received:  {
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> {
>> > > >> >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
>> > > >> >> >> >> >} }
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> > > >> >>NicProfile[
>> > > >> >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type
>> > Public
>> > > >> >>from
>> > > >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >nics
>> > > >> >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>> > > >> >> >> >> >4
>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>> will
>> > > be
>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>> > > >> >> >> >> >3
>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>> will
>> > > be
>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>> will
>> > > be
>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >> >> >>wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from
>> the
>> > > >> >>moment
>> > > >> >> >>I
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>reboot
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start
>> capturing
>> > > log,
>> > > >> >>and
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>start it
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside
>> VR) ?
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is
>> > > different
>> > > >> >>so
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I
>> > > noted
>> > > >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>VR
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for
>> ethnull to
>> > > be
>> > > >> >>up.
>> > > >> >> >> >>This
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>raises
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1.
>> > The
>> > > >> ACS
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>management
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down
>> the
>> > > road
>> > > >> >> >>where
>> > > >> >> >> >>ACS
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>gives
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you
>> would
>> > > >> >>capture
>> > > >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand
>> > till
>> > > >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>exception,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might
>> > need
>> > > to
>> > > >> >> >>reed
>> > > >> >> >> >>into
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a
>> clue.
>> > > The
>> > > >> >> >>thing
>> > > >> >> >> >>is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that I
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I
>> > > cannot
>> > > >> >> >>point
>> > > >> >> >> >>you
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>> > > >> >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>Created a
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>> > > >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >>wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value
>> > > "untagged" -
>> > > >> >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is
>> used
>> > in
>> > > >> API
>> > > >> >> >>call
>> > > >> >> >> >>(or
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >better
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server
>> > logs).
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Best,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
>> > > >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You
>> have
>> > > one
>> > > >> >>like
>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>and
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same
>> > vlan. I
>> > > >> am
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>wondering
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I
>> > think
>> > > >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >>is
>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in
>> > your
>> > > >> >>db?
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this
>> issue :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by
>> Inktank
>> > > for
>> > > >> >>CEPH
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>support),
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>OS
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part
>> :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 =
>> Debian 7
>> > > x64
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was
>> > > >> ofcourse
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this
>> > > should
>> > > >> >>not
>> > > >> >> >>be
>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>issues
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard"
>> =
>> > all
>> > > >> >>SVMs
>> > > >> >> >> >>are on
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>CEPH
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to
>> > make
>> > > >> >>some
>> > > >> >> >>new
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>System
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I
>> > did,
>> > > I
>> > > >> >>also
>> > > >> >> >> >>have
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>done
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>same
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System
>> > Offering
>> > > >> as
>> > > >> >> >> >>default
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>-
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use
>> "Change
>> > > >> >> >> >>Offering..."
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>button
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>on
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the
>> content
>> > is
>> > > >> >> >>folowing
>> > > >> >> >> >>at
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moment
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal
>> > > >> dns1=8.8.8.8
>> > > >> >> >> dns2=
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75
>> > > eth0mask=255.255.0.0
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have
>> IP
>> > > info,
>> > > >> >> >>eth0
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(control
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used
>> > for
>> > > >> >>Tiers
>> > > >> >> >> >>get IP
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>info
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public
>> NIC)
>> > > and
>> > > >> >> >>start
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>ifup
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port
>> > Forwarding
>> > > >> >>etc
>> > > >> >> >>does
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>not
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>work...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my
>> > > >> >>"Public"
>> > > >> >> >> >>network
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT
>> > tagged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine
>> is
>> > the
>> > > >> VR
>> > > >> >> >>used
>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>Shared
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP
>> > range
>> > > >> >>(also
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>efectively
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP
>> range
>> > > from
>> > > >> >> >> >>untagged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there
>> is
>> > > any
>> > > >> >>way
>> > > >> >> >>at
>> > > >> >> >> >>all
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not
>> > work,
>> > > >> >>after
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>rebooting
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>VR
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for
>> > 4.4,
>> > > >> but
>> > > >> >> >>right
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>now,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not
>> > > >> >> >>operational at
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>all...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well.
>> > > Looking
>> > > >> >>at
>> > > >> >> >>you
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>issue I
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back
>> then
>> > > when
>> > > >> >> >> >>upgrading
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom
>> > build
>> > > >> >>svm
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>template.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before
>> explaining
>> > > what
>> > > >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >>cause
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>was
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> our
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using?
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised
>> > instance
>> > > >> >>(PV)
>> > > >> >> >>or
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>hardware
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on
>> the VR
>> > > >> uuid
>> > > >> >> >>and
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>check
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is
>> > unset.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS
>> > (guest_os_id
>> > > >> in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>vm_instance
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>table
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template
>> was
>> > not
>> > > >> >> >> >>supported
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>on
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore
>> the
>> > VR
>> > > >> was
>> > > >> >> >> >>started
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>by
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>XS
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>as
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the
>> arguments
>> > > >> >>passed
>> > > >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>them
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
>> > > >> >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order
>> to
>> > > work.
>> > > >> >> >> >>cmdline
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>contains
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as
>> a
>> > HVM
>> > > >> it
>> > > >> >> >>will
>> > > >> >> >> >>not
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>get
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I
>> know
>> > > >> >>editing
>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>DB
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is
>> no
>> > > >> other
>> > > >> >> >>way
>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>this
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>case)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the
>> systemvmtemplate
>> > to
>> > > >> >> >> >>something
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>supported
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> by
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
>> > > >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net
>> (that
>> > > is
>> > > >> >>both
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>tagged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM
>> > bridge,
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> >> >>over
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> outside
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
>> > > >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical
>> > net?
>> > > >> or
>> > > >> >> >>two
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>physical
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>nets
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal
>> > Reddy
>> > > >> >>Uradi
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic
>> (vlan
>> > > 500)
>> > > >> >>and
>> > > >> >> >>the
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>second
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no
>> > vlan
>> > > >> >>tags,
>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>is
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel
>> > over
>> > > >> >> >>physical
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM,
>> Andrija
>> > > >> >>Panic <
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or
>> > your
>> > > >> >> >>physical
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>network?
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with
>> vlan
>> > > 500!
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >--
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >--
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >Andrija Panić
>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >> >  http://admintweets.com
>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > Andrija Panić
>> > > > --------------------------------------
>> > > >   http://admintweets.com
>> > > > --------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Andrija Panić
>> > > --------------------------------------
>> > >   http://admintweets.com
>> > > --------------------------------------
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Andrija Panić
>> --------------------------------------
>>   http://admintweets.com
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>
>

Reply via email to