Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
{
"com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand": {
"nic": {
"deviceId": 1,
"networkRateMbps": 99999,
"defaultNic": true,
"uuid": "6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff",
"ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
"netmask": "255.255.255.0",
"gateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
"mac": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
"broadcastType": "Vlan",
"type": "Public",
"broadcastUri": "vlan://untagged",
"isolationUri": "vlan://untagged",
"isSecurityGroupEnabled": false,
"name": "breth1-500"
},
"instanceName": "r-801-VM",
"vmType": "DomainRouter",
"wait": 0
}
}
and here is your ip associate command:
{
"com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand": {
"ipAddresses": [
{
"accountId": 11,
"publicIp": "46.232.xxx.246",
"sourceNat": true,
"add": true,
"oneToOneNat": false,
"firstIP": false,
"broadcastUri": "untagged",
"vlanGateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
"vlanNetmask": "255.255.255.0",
"vifMacAddress": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
"networkRate": 99999,
"trafficType": "Public",
"networkName": "breth1-500"
}
],
"accessDetails": {
"router.guest.ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
"zone.network.type": "Advanced",
"router.name": "r-801-VM",
"router.ip": "169.254.0.52"
},
"wait": 0
}
}
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
> configuration...
>
>
> On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as it
> > seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to
> work?
> > If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in BridgeVifDriver
> or
> > the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
> >
> > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
> > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM, but still
> > > doesn't work...
> > > Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
> > >
> > > $ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
> > > ...
> > > <description>Debian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)</description>
> > > ...
> > > <os>
> > > <type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'>hvm</type>
> > > <boot dev='cdrom'/>
> > > <boot dev='hd'/>
> > > </os>
> > >
> > > :(
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
> > > >
> > > > Per docs
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
> > > > , you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for system-kvm-4.3
> > > template...
> > > > (same for xen and vmware templatest)
> > > >
> > > > Will change now DB to point to debian 5, and let you know.
> > > >
> > > > This is guest_os_id: 184 | 2 | NULL |
> > > > 986a0e98-39d6-11e3-8f93-0025904e4412 | Debian GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 30 May 2014 15:45, Joris van Lieshout <
> > > jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Andrija,
> > > >>
> > > >> The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There
> must
> > > be
> > > >> a way to list supported os types.
> > > >>
> > > >> I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3)
> > and I
> > > >> don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
> > > >>
> > > >> select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
> > > >> guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
> > > >>
> > > >> What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72
> (Debian
> > 5
> > > >> 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template
> (where
> > > >> type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards,
> > > >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >>
> > > >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Joris,
> > > >> >
> > > >> >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not
> sure
> > > how
> > > >> >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to
> > > define
> > > >> >it
> > > >> >as another OS type... ?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Thanks again,
> > > >> >Andrija
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <
> > > >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at
> > > >> BridgeVifDriver.java
> > > >> >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is generated)
> > you
> > > >> >>can
> > > >> >> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS hits
> the
> > > >> >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to
> believer
> > > that
> > > >> >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing
> > that
> > > >> >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >OK, thanks Joris.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the
> systemvm-kvm-4.3
> > > >> >> >template...
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Thanks.
> > > >> >> >Andrija
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can
> see
> > > >> >>"<type
> > > >> >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS
> > well
> > > >> >>enough
> > > >> >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting
> > the
> > > VR
> > > >> >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I
> > do
> > > >> see
> > > >> >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java
> code,
> > is
> > > >> >>this:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG
> > [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
> > > >> >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
> > > >> >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
> > > >> >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
> > > >> >> >> Executing:
> > > >> >> >>
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
> > > >> >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull
> -g
> > > >> >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the nic
> > > >> >>profile
> > > >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic
> id
> > > and
> > > >> >> >> returns null.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is
> > where
> > > we
> > > >> >> >>might
> > > >> >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the
> > > code.
> > > >> >>:)
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> > > >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
> > > >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> > > >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net
> host:
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
> > > >> >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
> > > >> >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
> > > >> >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest os:
> > > >> Debian
> > > >> >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >Best,
> > > >> >> >> >Andrija
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
> > > >> >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > > >> >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> 1-609104082:
> > > >> >>Sending
> > > >> >> >> {
> > > >> >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver:
> v1,
> > > >> Flags:
> > > >> >> >> >>100111,
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
> > > >> >>>>>>".
> > > >> >> >>>>..
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent
> > > handles.
> > > >> >>For
> > > >> >> >>XS
> > > >> >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management
> server
> > > but
> > > >> >>for
> > > >> >> >> >>KVM,
> > > >> >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the
> > > >> >>cloudstack
> > > >> >> >> >>agent
> > > >> >> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor
> > > >> >>executing
> > > >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search
> top
> > > down
> > > >> >>for
> > > >> >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from
> the
> > > >> >>agent
> > > >> >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> > > >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
> > > >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> > > >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <
> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
> > > >> >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync
> > > inspecting
> > > >> >>src
> > > >> >> >> >>type
> > > >> >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> > 4-1248669612:
> > > >> >> >>Sending
> > > >> >> >> >>{
> > > >> >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver:
> v1,
> > > >> >>Flags:
> > > >> >> >> >> 100011,
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
> > > >> >>>>>>>.a
> > > >> >> >>>>>pa
> > > >> >> >> >>>ch
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
> > > >> >>>>>>>f-
> > > >> >> >>>>>b0
> > > >> >> >> >>>b4
> > > >> >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
> > > >> >> >> >>t
> > > >> >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
> > > >> >>>>>>>CO
> > > >> >> >>>>>W2
> > > >> >> >> >>>",
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
> > > >> >> >> >> >*hvm":true*
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
> > > >> >>>>>>>ds
> > > >> >> >>>>>ta
> > > >> >> >> >>>ck
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
> > > >> >>>>>>>3f
> > > >> >> >>>>>79
> > > >> >> >> >>>b1
> > > >> >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
> > > >> >> >> >>8
> > > >> >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
> > > >> >>>>>>>yp
> > > >> >> >>>>>e"
> > > >> >> >> >>>:"
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
> > > >> >>>>>>>"u
> > > >> >> >>>>>ui
> > > >> >> >> >>>d"
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
> > > >> >>>>>>>re
> > > >> >> >>>>>":
> > > >> >> >> >>>{"
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
> > > >> >>>>>>>2e
> > > >> >> >>>>>-1
> > > >> >> >> >>>a6
> > > >> >> >> >>
> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
> > > >> >> >> >>8
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
> > > >> >>>>>>>64
> > > >> >> >>>>>,"
> > > >> >> >> >>>vm
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
> > > >> >>>>>>>0,
> > > >> >> >>>>>"h
> > > >> >> >> >>>yp
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
> > > >> >>>>>]
> > > >> >> >> >> >}
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612:
> Processing:
> > > {
> > > >> >> >>Ans: ,
> > > >> >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
> > > >> >>>>>>>"o
> > > >> >> >>>>>rg
> > > >> >> >> >>>.a
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
> > > >> >>>>>>>":
> > > >> >> >>>>>"9
> > > >> >> >> >>>c4
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
> > > >> >>>>>>>:0
> > > >> >> >>>>>}}
> > > >> >> >> >>>,"
> > > >> >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
> > > >> >> >> >> >}
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
> > 4-1248669612:
> > > >> >> >> >>Received: {
> > > >> >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, {
> > > >> >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
> > > >> >> >> >> >} }
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
> > > >> >>NicProfile[
> > > >> >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type
> > Public
> > > >> >>from
> > > >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >nics
> > > >> >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
> > > >> >> >> >> >4
> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
> will
> > > be
> > > >> >> >>plugged
> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
> > > >> >> >> >> >3
> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
> will
> > > be
> > > >> >> >>plugged
> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
> > > >> >> >> >> >004
> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
> will
> > > be
> > > >> >> >>plugged
> > > >> >> >> >> >later
> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
> > > >> >>>>>>>an
> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
> > > >> >> >> >> >004
> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
> > > >> >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
> > > >> >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <
> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from
> the
> > > >> >>moment
> > > >> >> >>I
> > > >> >> >> >> >>reboot
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start
> capturing
> > > log,
> > > >> >>and
> > > >> >> >> >> >>start it
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR)
> ?
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is
> > > different
> > > >> >>so
> > > >> >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I
> > > noted
> > > >> >>that
> > > >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >>VR
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull
> to
> > > be
> > > >> >>up.
> > > >> >> >> >>This
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>raises
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1.
> > The
> > > >> ACS
> > > >> >> >> >> >>management
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the
> > > road
> > > >> >> >>where
> > > >> >> >> >>ACS
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>gives
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would
> > > >> >>capture
> > > >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand
> > till
> > > >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >>exception,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might
> > need
> > > to
> > > >> >> >>reed
> > > >> >> >> >>into
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a
> clue.
> > > The
> > > >> >> >>thing
> > > >> >> >> >>is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that I
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I
> > > cannot
> > > >> >> >>point
> > > >> >> >> >>you
> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> > > >> >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
> > > >> >> >> >> >>Created a
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <
> > > >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value
> > > "untagged" -
> > > >> >> >>that
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used
> > in
> > > >> API
> > > >> >> >>call
> > > >> >> >> >>(or
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >better
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server
> > logs).
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Best,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
> > > >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You
> have
> > > one
> > > >> >>like
> > > >> >> >> >>that
> > > >> >> >> >> >>and
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same
> > vlan. I
> > > >> am
> > > >> >> >> >> >>wondering
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I
> > think
> > > >> >>that
> > > >> >> >>is
> > > >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in
> > your
> > > >> >>db?
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue
> :)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by
> Inktank
> > > for
> > > >> >>CEPH
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>support),
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>OS
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian
> 7
> > > x64
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was
> > > >> ofcourse
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this
> > > should
> > > >> >>not
> > > >> >> >>be
> > > >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>issues
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" =
> > all
> > > >> >>SVMs
> > > >> >> >> >>are on
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>CEPH
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to
> > make
> > > >> >>some
> > > >> >> >>new
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>System
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I
> > did,
> > > I
> > > >> >>also
> > > >> >> >> >>have
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>done
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>same
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System
> > Offering
> > > >> as
> > > >> >> >> >>default
> > > >> >> >> >> >>-
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use
> "Change
> > > >> >> >> >>Offering..."
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>button
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>on
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content
> > is
> > > >> >> >>folowing
> > > >> >> >> >>at
> > > >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moment
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal
> > > >> dns1=8.8.8.8
> > > >> >> >> dns2=
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75
> > > eth0mask=255.255.0.0
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP
> > > info,
> > > >> >> >>eth0
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(control
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used
> > for
> > > >> >>Tiers
> > > >> >> >> >>get IP
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>info
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public
> NIC)
> > > and
> > > >> >> >>start
> > > >> >> >> >> >>ifup
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port
> > Forwarding
> > > >> >>etc
> > > >> >> >>does
> > > >> >> >> >> >>not
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>work...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my
> > > >> >>"Public"
> > > >> >> >> >>network
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(in
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT
> > tagged
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is
> > the
> > > >> VR
> > > >> >> >>used
> > > >> >> >> >>in
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>Shared
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP
> > range
> > > >> >>(also
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>efectively
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP
> range
> > > from
> > > >> >> >> >>untagged
> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there
> is
> > > any
> > > >> >>way
> > > >> >> >>at
> > > >> >> >> >>all
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not
> > work,
> > > >> >>after
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>rebooting
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>VR
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for
> > 4.4,
> > > >> but
> > > >> >> >>right
> > > >> >> >> >> >>now,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not
> > > >> >> >>operational at
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>all...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well.
> > > Looking
> > > >> >>at
> > > >> >> >>you
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>issue I
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then
> > > when
> > > >> >> >> >>upgrading
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom
> > build
> > > >> >>svm
> > > >> >> >> >> >>template.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before
> explaining
> > > what
> > > >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >>cause
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>was
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> our
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using?
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised
> > instance
> > > >> >>(PV)
> > > >> >> >>or
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>hardware
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the
> VR
> > > >> uuid
> > > >> >> >>and
> > > >> >> >> >> >>check
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is
> > unset.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS
> > (guest_os_id
> > > >> in
> > > >> >> >> >> >>vm_instance
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>table
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was
> > not
> > > >> >> >> >>supported
> > > >> >> >> >> >>on
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the
> > VR
> > > >> was
> > > >> >> >> >>started
> > > >> >> >> >> >>by
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>XS
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>as
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the
> arguments
> > > >> >>passed
> > > >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> >> >>them
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>in
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
> > > >> >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which in
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order to
> > > work.
> > > >> >> >> >>cmdline
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>contains
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as a
> > HVM
> > > >> it
> > > >> >> >>will
> > > >> >> >> >>not
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>get
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I
> know
> > > >> >>editing
> > > >> >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >>DB
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is
> no
> > > >> other
> > > >> >> >>way
> > > >> >> >> >>in
> > > >> >> >> >> >>this
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>case)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the
> systemvmtemplate
> > to
> > > >> >> >> >>something
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>supported
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> by
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
> > > >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net
> (that
> > > is
> > > >> >>both
> > > >> >> >> >> >>tagged
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM
> > bridge,
> > > >> and
> > > >> >> >>over
> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> outside
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
> > > >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical
> > net?
> > > >> or
> > > >> >> >>two
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>physical
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>nets
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal
> > Reddy
> > > >> >>Uradi
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan
> > > 500)
> > > >> >>and
> > > >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>second
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no
> > vlan
> > > >> >>tags,
> > > >> >> >> >>that
> > > >> >> >> >> >>is
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel
> > over
> > > >> >> >>physical
> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM,
> Andrija
> > > >> >>Panic <
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or
> > your
> > > >> >> >>physical
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>network?
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan
> > > 500!
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >--
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Andrija Panić
> > > >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >> > http://admintweets.com
> > > >> >--------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Andrija Panić
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > > http://admintweets.com
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Andrija Panić
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > http://admintweets.com
> > > --------------------------------------
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
> --------------------------------------
> http://admintweets.com
> --------------------------------------
>
