Andrija, The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There must be a way to list supported os types.
I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3) and I don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed. select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%'; What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72 (Debian 5 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template (where type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM'). Kind regards, Joris van Lieshout Schuberg Philis On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >Joris, > >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not sure how >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to define >it >as another OS type... ? > >Thanks again, >Andrija > > >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> >wrote: > >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at BridgeVifDriver.java >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is generated) you >>can >> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS hits the >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to believer that >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing that >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >OK, thanks Joris. >> > >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the systemvm-kvm-4.3 >> >template... >> > >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more. >> > >> >Thanks. >> >Andrija >> > >> > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com >> > >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can see >>"<type >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS well >>enough >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting the VR >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I do see >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully... >> >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java code, is >>this: >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver] >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged] >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command: >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:) >> >> Executing: >> >> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0 >> >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the nic >>profile >> >>to >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic id and >> >> returns null. >> >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is where we >> >>might >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the code. >>:) >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> Boeingavenue 271 >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk >> >> schubergphilis.com >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672 >> >> +31 6-51428188 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris, >> >> > >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net host: >> >> > >> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9 >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC >> >> > >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error: >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper] >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest os: Debian >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit) >> >> > >> >> >Best, >> >> >Andrija >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com >> >> > >> >> >wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :) >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info. >> >> >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 1-609104082: >>Sending >> >> { >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags: >> >> >>100111, >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM >>>>>>". >> >>>>.. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent handles. >>For >> >>XS >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management server but >>for >> >> >>KVM, >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the >>cloudstack >> >> >>agent >> >> >> service on the hypervisor. >> >> >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor >>executing >> >>the >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search top down >>for >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from the >>agent >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence. >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271 >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk >> >> >> schubergphilis.com >> >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672 >> >> >> +31 6-51428188 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris, >> >> >> > >> >> >> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold >> >> >> > >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync inspecting >>src >> >> >>type >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612: >> >>Sending >> >> >>{ >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, >>Flags: >> >> >> 100011, >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org >>>>>>>.a >> >>>>>pa >> >> >>>ch >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0 >>>>>>>f- >> >>>>>b0 >> >> >>>b4 >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":" >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas >> >> >>t >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q >>>>>>>CO >> >>>>>W2 >> >> >>>", >> >> >> >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff"," >> >> >> >*hvm":true* >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou >>>>>>>ds >> >>>>>ta >> >> >>>ck >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220 >>>>>>>3f >> >>>>>79 >> >> >>>b1 >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":" >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD:// >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8 >> >> >>8 >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6 >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT >>>>>>>yp >> >>>>>e" >> >> >>>:" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{ >>>>>>>"u >> >>>>>ui >> >> >>>d" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto >>>>>>>re >> >>>>>": >> >> >>>{" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342 >>>>>>>2e >> >>>>>-1 >> >> >>>a6 >> >> >> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":" >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD:// >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8 >> >> >>8 >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10 >>>>>>>64 >> >>>>>," >> >> >>>vm >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId": >>>>>>>0, >> >>>>>"h >> >> >>>yp >> >> >> >> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}} >>>>>] >> >> >> >} >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612: Processing: { >> >>Ans: , >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{ >>>>>>>"o >> >>>>>rg >> >> >>>.a >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path >>>>>>>": >> >>>>>"9 >> >> >>>c4 >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id" >>>>>>>:0 >> >>>>>}} >> >> >>>," >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}] >> >> >> >} >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612: >> >> >>Received: { >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer >> >> >> >} } >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic >>NicProfile[ >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type Public >>from >> >>the >> >> >> >nics >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl >>>>>>>an >> >>>>>:/ >> >> >>>/4 >> >> >> >4 >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be >> >>plugged >> >> >> >later >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl >>>>>>>an >> >>>>>:/ >> >> >>>/4 >> >> >> >3 >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be >> >>plugged >> >> >> >later >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl >>>>>>>an >> >>>>>:/ >> >> >>>/3 >> >> >> >004 >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be >> >>plugged >> >> >> >later >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl >>>>>>>an >> >>>>>:/ >> >> >>>/3 >> >> >> >004 >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Thanks, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com >> >> >> > >> >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271 >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672 >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the >>moment >> >>I >> >> >> >>reboot >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log, >>and >> >> >> >>start it >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >Thanks, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different >>so >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is >> >> >> >> >> not the issue. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I noted >>that >> >> >>the >> >> >> >>VR >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be >>up. >> >> >>This >> >> >> >> >>raises >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1. The ACS >> >> >> >>management >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the road >> >>where >> >> >>ACS >> >> >> >> >>gives >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would >>capture >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand till >>the >> >> >> >>exception, >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might need to >> >>reed >> >> >>into >> >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a clue. The >> >>thing >> >> >>is >> >> >> >> >>that I >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I cannot >> >>point >> >> >>you >> >> >> >>to >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e) >> >> >> >>Created a >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen, >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value "untagged" - >> >>that >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used in API >> >>call >> >> >>(or >> >> >> >> >> >better >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server logs). >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >Best, >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one >>like >> >> >>that >> >> >> >>and >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I am >> >> >> >>wondering >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think >>that >> >>is >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your >>db? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris, >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue :) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank for >>CEPH >> >> >> >> >>support), >> >> >> >> >> >>OS >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled. >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :) >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64 >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian 7 x64 >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was ofcourse >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2 >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this should >>not >> >>be >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >>issues >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" = all >>SVMs >> >> >>are on >> >> >> >> >>CEPH >> >> >> >> >> >>- >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to make >>some >> >>new >> >> >> >> >>System >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I did, I >>also >> >> >>have >> >> >> >> >>done >> >> >> >> >> >>same >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System Offering as >> >> >>default >> >> >> >>- >> >> >> >> >> >>which >> >> >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use "Change >> >> >>Offering..." >> >> >> >> >>button >> >> >> >> >> >>on >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs... >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content is >> >>folowing >> >> >>at >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> moment >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal dns1=8.8.8.8 >> >> dns2= >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75 eth0mask=255.255.0.0 >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP info, >> >>eth0 >> >> >> >> >>(control >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used for >>Tiers >> >> >>get IP >> >> >> >> >>info >> >> >> >> >> >> fine. >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public NIC) and >> >>start >> >> >> >>ifup >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 - >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port Forwarding >>etc >> >>does >> >> >> >>not >> >> >> >> >> >>work... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my >>"Public" >> >> >>network >> >> >> >> >>(in >> >> >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT tagged >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)... >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is the VR >> >>used >> >> >>in >> >> >> >> >>Shared >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP range >>(also >> >> >> >> >>efectively >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP range from >> >> >>untagged >> >> >> >>to >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there is any >>way >> >>at >> >> >>all >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not work, >>after >> >> >> >> >>rebooting >> >> >> >> >> >>VR >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui). >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > :) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for 4.4, but >> >>right >> >> >> >>now, >> >> >> >> >>I'm >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not >> >>operational at >> >> >> >> >>all... >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout < >> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking >>at >> >>you >> >> >> >> >>issue I >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then when >> >> >>upgrading >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1 >> >> >> >> >> >>to >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build >>svm >> >> >> >>template. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before explaining what >>the >> >> >>cause >> >> >> >> >>was >> >> >> >> >> >>in >> >> >> >> >> >> our >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised instance >>(PV) >> >>or >> >> >> >> >>hardware >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the VR uuid >> >>and >> >> >> >>check >> >> >> >> >>that >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is unset. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS (guest_os_id in >> >> >> >>vm_instance >> >> >> >> >> >>table >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was not >> >> >>supported >> >> >> >>on >> >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the VR was >> >> >>started >> >> >> >>by >> >> >> >> >>XS >> >> >> >> >> >>as >> >> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the arguments >>passed >> >>to >> >> >> >>them >> >> >> >> >>in >> >> >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline >> >> >> >> >> >>which in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order to work. >> >> >>cmdline >> >> >> >> >> >>contains >> >> >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as a HVM it >> >>will >> >> >>not >> >> >> >> >>get >> >> >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I know >>editing >> >> >>the >> >> >> >>DB >> >> >> >> >>is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is no other >> >>way >> >> >>in >> >> >> >>this >> >> >> >> >> >>case) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the systemvmtemplate to >> >> >>something >> >> >> >> >> >>supported >> >> >> >> >> >> by >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic" >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is >>both >> >> >> >>tagged >> >> >> >> >>vlan >> >> >> >> >> >> 500, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and >> >>over >> >> >> >>eth1 >> >> >> >> >>to >> >> >> >> >> >> outside >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or >> >>two >> >> >> >> >>physical >> >> >> >> >> >>nets >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy >>Uradi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) >>and >> >>the >> >> >> >> >>second >> >> >> >> >> >> half is >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan >>tags, >> >> >>that >> >> >> >>is >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over >> >>physical >> >> >> >>eth1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija >>Panic < >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your >> >>physical >> >> >> >> >>network? >> >> >> >> >> >> You >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >> >> > -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >-- >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >-- >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >-- >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> > >> >> >Andrija Panić >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> > http://admintweets.com >> >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >Andrija Panić >> >-------------------------------------- >> > http://admintweets.com >> >-------------------------------------- >> >> > > >-- > >Andrija Panić >-------------------------------------- > http://admintweets.com >--------------------------------------