Andrija,
The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There must be
a way to list supported os types.
I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3) and I
don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72 (Debian 5
64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template (where
type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Joris,
>
>do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not sure how
>to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to define
>it
>as another OS type... ?
>
>Thanks again,
>Andrija
>
>
>On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at BridgeVifDriver.java
>> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is generated) you
>>can
>> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS hits the
>> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to believer that
>> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing that
>> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Joris van Lieshout
>>
>> Schuberg Philis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >OK, thanks Joris.
>> >
>> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the systemvm-kvm-4.3
>> >template...
>> >
>> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >Andrija
>> >
>> >
>> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
>><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> >
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >>
>> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you can see
>>"<type
>> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS well
>>enough
>> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on getting the VR
>> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other hand I do see
>> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
>> >>
>> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java code, is
>>this:
>> >>
>> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
>> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
>> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
>> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
>> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
>> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>> >> Executing:
>> >> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
>> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
>> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>> >>
>> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the nic
>>profile
>> >>to
>> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the nic id and
>> >> returns null.
>> >>
>> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is where we
>> >>might
>> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the code.
>>:)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >>
>> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>> >> schubergphilis.com
>> >>
>> >> +31 20-7506672
>> >> +31 6-51428188
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Joris,
>> >> >
>> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net host:
>> >> >
>> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
>> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
>> >> >
>> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
>> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
>> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest os: Debian
>> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>> >> >
>> >> >Best,
>> >> >Andrija
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
>> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> >> >
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
>> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 1-609104082:
>>Sending
>> >> {
>> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1, Flags:
>> >> >>100111,
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
>>>>>>".
>> >>>>..
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent handles.
>>For
>> >>XS
>> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management server but
>>for
>> >> >>KVM,
>> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the
>>cloudstack
>> >> >>agent
>> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor
>>executing
>> >>the
>> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search top down
>>for
>> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log from the
>>agent
>> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
>>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync inspecting
>>src
>> >> >>type
>> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612:
>> >>Sending
>> >> >>{
>> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net), Ver: v1,
>>Flags:
>> >> >> 100011,
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
>>>>>>>.a
>> >>>>>pa
>> >> >>>ch
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
>>>>>>>f-
>> >>>>>b0
>> >> >>>b4
>> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
>> >> >>t
>> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
>>>>>>>CO
>> >>>>>W2
>> >> >>>",
>> >> >> >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
>> >> >> >*hvm":true*
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
>>>>>>>ds
>> >>>>>ta
>> >> >>>ck
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
>>>>>>>3f
>> >>>>>79
>> >> >>>b1
>> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>> >> >>8
>> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
>>>>>>>yp
>> >>>>>e"
>> >> >>>:"
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
>>>>>>>"u
>> >>>>>ui
>> >> >>>d"
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
>>>>>>>re
>> >>>>>":
>> >> >>>{"
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
>>>>>>>2e
>> >>>>>-1
>> >> >>>a6
>> >> >> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>> >> >>8
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
>>>>>>>64
>> >>>>>,"
>> >> >>>vm
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
>>>>>>>0,
>> >>>>>"h
>> >> >>>yp
>> >> >>
>>
>>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
>>>>>]
>> >> >> >}
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612: Processing: {
>> >>Ans: ,
>> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
>>>>>>>"o
>> >>>>>rg
>> >> >>>.a
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
>>>>>>>":
>> >>>>>"9
>> >> >>>c4
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
>>>>>>>:0
>> >>>>>}}
>> >> >>>,"
>> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
>> >> >> >}
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq 4-1248669612:
>> >> >>Received: {
>> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, {
>> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
>> >> >> >} }
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>NicProfile[
>> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type Public
>>from
>> >>the
>> >> >> >nics
>> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
>>>>>>>an
>> >>>>>:/
>> >> >>>/4
>> >> >> >4
>> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be
>> >>plugged
>> >> >> >later
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
>>>>>>>an
>> >>>>>:/
>> >> >>>/4
>> >> >> >3
>> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be
>> >>plugged
>> >> >> >later
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>>>>>>an
>> >>>>>:/
>> >> >>>/3
>> >> >> >004
>> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic will be
>> >>plugged
>> >> >> >later
>> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>>>>>>an
>> >>>>>:/
>> >> >>>/3
>> >> >> >004
>> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log from the
>>moment
>> >>I
>> >> >> >>reboot
>> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start capturing log,
>>and
>> >> >> >>start it
>> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside VR) ?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is different
>>so
>> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
>> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided I noted
>>that
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >>VR
>> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for ethnull to be
>>up.
>> >> >>This
>> >> >> >> >>raises
>> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of 1. The ACS
>> >> >> >>management
>> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down the road
>> >>where
>> >> >>ACS
>> >> >> >> >>gives
>> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you would
>>capture
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from startCommand till
>>the
>> >> >> >>exception,
>> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might need to
>> >>reed
>> >> >>into
>> >> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a clue. The
>> >>thing
>> >> >>is
>> >> >> >> >>that I
>> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I cannot
>> >>point
>> >> >>you
>> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it is
>> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
>> >> >> >>Created a
>> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
>> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value "untagged" -
>> >>that
>> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is used in API
>> >>call
>> >> >>(or
>> >> >> >> >> >better
>> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server logs).
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Best,
>> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
>><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You have one
>>like
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >>and
>> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same vlan. I am
>> >> >> >>wondering
>> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I think
>>that
>> >>is
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged' in your
>>db?
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
>> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this issue :)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by Inktank for
>>CEPH
>> >> >> >> >>support),
>> >> >> >> >> >>OS
>> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part :)
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 = Debian 7 x64
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was ofcourse
>> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
>> >> >> >> >> >> -
>> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this should
>>not
>> >>be
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >>issues
>> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of "standard" = all
>>SVMs
>> >> >>are on
>> >> >> >> >>CEPH
>> >> >> >> >> >>-
>> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database to make
>>some
>> >>new
>> >> >> >> >>System
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I did, I
>>also
>> >> >>have
>> >> >> >> >>done
>> >> >> >> >> >>same
>> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System Offering as
>> >> >>default
>> >> >> >>-
>> >> >> >> >> >>which
>> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use "Change
>> >> >>Offering..."
>> >> >> >> >>button
>> >> >> >> >> >>on
>> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the content is
>> >>folowing
>> >> >>at
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> moment
>> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal dns1=8.8.8.8
>> >> dns2=
>> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
>> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75 eth0mask=255.255.0.0
>> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
>> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have IP info,
>> >>eth0
>> >> >> >> >>(control
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are used for
>>Tiers
>> >> >>get IP
>> >> >> >> >>info
>> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public NIC) and
>> >>start
>> >> >> >>ifup
>> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
>> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port Forwarding
>>etc
>> >>does
>> >> >> >>not
>> >> >> >> >> >>work...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to my
>>"Public"
>> >> >>network
>> >> >> >> >>(in
>> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT tagged
>> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine is the VR
>> >>used
>> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> >>Shared
>> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP range
>>(also
>> >> >> >> >>efectively
>> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP range from
>> >> >>untagged
>> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if there is any
>>way
>> >>at
>> >> >>all
>> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not work,
>>after
>> >> >> >> >>rebooting
>> >> >> >> >> >>VR
>> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for 4.4, but
>> >>right
>> >> >> >>now,
>> >> >> >> >>I'm
>> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not
>> >>operational at
>> >> >> >> >>all...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
>> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well. Looking
>>at
>> >>you
>> >> >> >> >>issue I
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back then when
>> >> >>upgrading
>> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
>> >> >> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom build
>>svm
>> >> >> >>template.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before explaining what
>>the
>> >> >>cause
>> >> >> >> >>was
>> >> >> >> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> >> >> our
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you using?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised instance
>>(PV)
>> >>or
>> >> >> >> >>hardware
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on the VR uuid
>> >>and
>> >> >> >>check
>> >> >> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is unset.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS (guest_os_id in
>> >> >> >>vm_instance
>> >> >> >> >> >>table
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template was not
>> >> >>supported
>> >> >> >>on
>> >> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore the VR was
>> >> >>started
>> >> >> >>by
>> >> >> >> >>XS
>> >> >> >> >> >>as
>> >> >> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the arguments
>>passed
>> >>to
>> >> >> >>them
>> >> >> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
>> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>> >> >> >> >> >>which in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order to work.
>> >> >>cmdline
>> >> >> >> >> >>contains
>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started as a HVM it
>> >>will
>> >> >>not
>> >> >> >> >>get
>> >> >> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I know
>>editing
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >>DB
>> >> >> >> >>is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there is no other
>> >>way
>> >> >>in
>> >> >> >>this
>> >> >> >> >> >>case)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the systemvmtemplate to
>> >> >>something
>> >> >> >> >> >>supported
>> >> >> >> >> >> by
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
>> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is
>>both
>> >> >> >>tagged
>> >> >> >> >>vlan
>> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and
>> >>over
>> >> >> >>eth1
>> >> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >> >> outside
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
>> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or
>> >>two
>> >> >> >> >>physical
>> >> >> >> >> >>nets
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy
>>Uradi
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will work.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic
>> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500)
>>and
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>second
>> >> >> >> >> >> half is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan
>>tags,
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >>is
>> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over
>> >>physical
>> >> >> >>eth1
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland
>> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija
>>Panic <
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your
>> >>physical
>> >> >> >> >>network?
>> >> >> >> >> >> You
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >
>> >> >Andrija Panić
>> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> >--------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Andrija Panić
>> >--------------------------------------
>> > http://admintweets.com
>> >--------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Andrija Panić
>--------------------------------------
> http://admintweets.com
>--------------------------------------
