Marcus, I don't think it should be 'vlan://untagged'. If it works as
you describe this seems a bug. 'untagged' should be
broadcastdomaintype agnostic, shouldn't it?
If it should work that way then it is a bug/omission in the db upgrade.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, if you're in the position to play a bit... New deployments seem
> to work, and I believe it's because that broadcastUri is stored in the db
> in the new format:
>
> mysql> select id,vlan_id from vlan where network_id = (select id from
> networks where traffic_type="Public");
> +----+-----------------+
> | id | vlan_id |
> +----+-----------------+
> | 1 | vlan://untagged |
> +----+-----------------+
> 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
>
> I believe 4.2 and earlier would say just 'untagged' there. If you want to
> attempt changing that value to include vlan:// (if it is in fact missing),
> then restarting everything, that may fix the issue.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I thinnk the commit that caused the change was this or related to it. Is
>> there any way you could test a fix? Do you need me to build 4.3 RPMs or can
>> I just provide a patch? What works for you?
>>
>> commit 53d09c6f1843f04c5f1ab76be9419f5584302d1e
>> Date: Mon Aug 5 11:52:40 2013 +0200
>>
>> uri code per broadcast/isolation type , default is to accept anything
>> as uri , vlan and lswitch need some extra tlc
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Note the differences in broadcastUri, here is your plug command:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand": {
>>> "nic": {
>>> "deviceId": 1,
>>> "networkRateMbps": 99999,
>>> "defaultNic": true,
>>> "uuid": "6c782af3-2071-4543-acdc-cb30096e89ff",
>>> "ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>>> "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>>> "gateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>>> "mac": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>>> "broadcastType": "Vlan",
>>> "type": "Public",
>>> "broadcastUri": "vlan://untagged",
>>> "isolationUri": "vlan://untagged",
>>> "isSecurityGroupEnabled": false,
>>> "name": "breth1-500"
>>> },
>>> "instanceName": "r-801-VM",
>>> "vmType": "DomainRouter",
>>> "wait": 0
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> and here is your ip associate command:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand": {
>>> "ipAddresses": [
>>> {
>>> "accountId": 11,
>>> "publicIp": "46.232.xxx.246",
>>> "sourceNat": true,
>>> "add": true,
>>> "oneToOneNat": false,
>>> "firstIP": false,
>>> "broadcastUri": "untagged",
>>> "vlanGateway": "46.232.xxx.1",
>>> "vlanNetmask": "255.255.255.0",
>>> "vifMacAddress": "06:53:82:00:00:25",
>>> "networkRate": 99999,
>>> "trafficType": "Public",
>>> "networkName": "breth1-500"
>>> }
>>> ],
>>> "accessDetails": {
>>> "router.guest.ip": "46.232.xxx.246",
>>> "zone.network.type": "Advanced",
>>> "router.name": "r-801-VM",
>>> "router.ip": "169.254.0.52"
>>> },
>>> "wait": 0
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes, correct, eth1 is present, and can be started by static IP
>>>> configuration...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30 May 2014 17:25, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Let me make sure I understand... the 'Plug' of the nic works fine, as
>>>> it
>>>> > seems you do have an eth1 and can manually assign the IP to get it to
>>>> work?
>>>> > If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in
>>>> BridgeVifDriver or
>>>> > the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
>>>> >
>>>> > vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
>>>> > 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic <
>>>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Nope, started, did check, it is reported now as Debian 5 VM, but
>>>> still
>>>> > > doesn't work...
>>>> > > Rebooted VPC (destroyed VR, new one created...)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > $ virsh dumpxml r-812-VM
>>>> > > ...
>>>> > > <description>Debian GNU/Linux 5(64-bit)</description>
>>>> > > ...
>>>> > > <os>
>>>> > > <type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel6.5.0'>hvm</type>
>>>> > > <boot dev='cdrom'/>
>>>> > > <boot dev='hd'/>
>>>> > > </os>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > :(
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Per docs
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
>>>> > > > , you should use Debian 7.0 64bit as OS type for system-kvm-4.3
>>>> > > template...
>>>> > > > (same for xen and vmware templatest)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Will change now DB to point to debian 5, and let you know.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > This is guest_os_id: 184 | 2 | NULL |
>>>> > > > 986a0e98-39d6-11e3-8f93-0025904e4412 | Debian GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 30 May 2014 15:45, Joris van Lieshout <
>>>> > > jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >> Andrija,
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> The thing is I don't know who the os matching on KVM works. There
>>>> must
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > >> a way to list supported os types.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> I also did some queuing on the guest_os_hypervisor table (ACS 4.3)
>>>> > and I
>>>> > > >> don't see Debian 7 for KVM listed.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> select * from guest_os join guest_os_hypervisor on
>>>> > > >> guest_os.id=guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_id where
>>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.hypervisor_type='KVM' and
>>>> > > >> guest_os_hypervisor.guest_os_name like '%Debian%';
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> What was the guest_os_id you where using? Could you try id 72
>>>> (Debian
>>>> > 5
>>>> > > >> 64-bit)? Adjust both os_type_id in vm_instance and vm_template
>>>> (where
>>>> > > >> type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM').
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On 30/05/14 15:33, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> >Joris,
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not
>>>> sure
>>>> > > how
>>>> > > >> >to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to
>>>> > > define
>>>> > > >> >it
>>>> > > >> >as another OS type... ?
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >Thanks again,
>>>> > > >> >Andrija
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >On 30 May 2014 15:30, Joris van Lieshout <
>>>> > > >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>>> > > >> >wrote:
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >> I've read back a bit in the code and if you look at
>>>> > > >> BridgeVifDriver.java
>>>> > > >> >> (this is where the log message with the nic profile is
>>>> generated)
>>>> > you
>>>> > > >> >>can
>>>> > > >> >> see that the nic information might be off already once ACS
>>>> hits the
>>>> > > >> >> LibvirtVMDef.InterfaceDef plug function. This leads be to
>>>> believer
>>>> > > that
>>>> > > >> >> the HVM/PV OS mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing
>>>> > that
>>>> > > >> >> first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> On 30/05/14 15:26, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >OK, thanks Joris.
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >I will try playing with OS version option, on the
>>>> systemvm-kvm-4.3
>>>> > > >> >> >template...
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >Let me know if I can help with anything more.
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >Thanks.
>>>> > > >> >> >Andrija
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >On 30 May 2014 15:19, Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> That does sound familiar and in the start xml of KVM you
>>>> can see
>>>> > > >> >>"<type
>>>> > > >> >> >> arch='x86_64' machine='pc'>hvm</type>". I don't know KVM+ACS
>>>> > well
>>>> > > >> >>enough
>>>> > > >> >> >> to judge if this is the cause but I thing focusing on
>>>> getting
>>>> > the
>>>> > > VR
>>>> > > >> >> >> started as PV guest might be worth trying. On the other
>>>> hand I
>>>> > do
>>>> > > >> see
>>>> > > >> >> >> patchviasocket.pl being executed successfully...
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> The other thing I see is, and now we're getting into java
>>>> code,
>>>> > is
>>>> > > >> >>this:
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,386{GMT} DEBUG
>>>> > [kvm.resource.BridgeVifDriver]
>>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>>>> > > >> >> >>nic=[Nic:Public-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged]
>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,502{GMT} DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>>>> > > >> >> >> (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Processing command:
>>>> > > >> >> >> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
>>>> > > >> >> >> 2014-05-30 14:41:01,506{GMT} DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>>> > > >> >> >>(agentRequest-Handler-3:)
>>>> > > >> >> >> Executing:
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
>>>> > > >> >> >> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c
>>>> ethnull -g
>>>> > > >> >> >> 46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> My suspicion is that somewhere in the translation from the
>>>> nic
>>>> > > >> >>profile
>>>> > > >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> the actual route_proxy.sh command ACS failes to find the
>>>> nic id
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > >> >> >> returns null.
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> Let me dig a bit deeper and see what I can find but this is
>>>> > where
>>>> > > we
>>>> > > >> >> >>might
>>>> > > >> >> >> need some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of
>>>> the
>>>> > > code.
>>>> > > >> >>:)
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>>> > > >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>>> > > >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>>> > > >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:49, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >I have turned on DEBUG loging in agent.log on cs1.xxx/net
>>>> host:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >So, management logs again: http://pastebin.com/F6BRf7Y9
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Agent logs on cs1.xxx: http://pastebin.com/BJauKbaC
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Not playing smart, but there is some error:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >[kvm.resource.KVMGuestOsMapper]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >(agentRequest-Handler-3:) Can't find the mapping of guest
>>>> os:
>>>> > > >> Debian
>>>> > > >> >> >> >GNU/Linux 7(64-bit)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Best,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 14:26, Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Bold formatting does not come trough on the dev list. :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> But u might need a bit more info.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> At a certain point I see this line
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 2014-05-30 13:56:23,935 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> (Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>>> 1-609104082:
>>>> > > >> >>Sending
>>>> > > >> >> >> {
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 1(cs1.xxxxx.net), Ver:
>>>> v1,
>>>> > > >> Flags:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>100111,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":801,"name":"r-801-VM
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>".
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>..
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> This is where the information is passed on to the agent
>>>> > > handles.
>>>> > > >> >>For
>>>> > > >> >> >>XS
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> this would initiate an agent handler on the management
>>>> server
>>>> > > but
>>>> > > >> >>for
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>KVM,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> if I remember correctly, it passed the command on to the
>>>> > > >> >>cloudstack
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>agent
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> service on the hypervisor.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Can you check the cloud service log on the KVM hypervisor
>>>> > > >> >>executing
>>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> request? it's this server cs1.xxxxx.net and then search
>>>> top
>>>> > > down
>>>> > > >> >>for
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 609104082 in the log. See if you can provide the log
>>>> from the
>>>> > > >> >>agent
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> handler thread started by that sequence.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 14:08, "Andrija Panic" <
>>>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >>wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >here is the management log:
>>>> http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Interesting parts (to me): in bold
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >>[o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) copyAsync
>>>> > > inspecting
>>>> > > >> >>src
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>type
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:21,905 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>>> > 4-1248669612:
>>>> > > >> >> >>Sending
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>{
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Cmd , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4(cs2.xxxxx.net),
>>>> Ver: v1,
>>>> > > >> >>Flags:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> 100011,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>.a
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>pa
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ch
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>e.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>f-
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>b0
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b4
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >-5e351e7cae55","origUrl":"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-mas
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>t
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >er-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>","uuid":"1adc1d2e-56ae-4a0f-b0b4-5e351e7cae55","id":414,"format":"Q
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>CO
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>W2
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>",
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > >"accountId":2,"checksum":"85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff","
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*hvm":true*
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>,"displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.3","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.clou
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>ds
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ta
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>ck
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b93422e-1a66-353d-88a8-220
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>3f
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>79
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>b1
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >a8-2203f79b1dc6
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>"}},"name":"414-2-ec331e74-5858-3153-91a9-1d706d9c533e","hypervisorT
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>yp
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>e"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>:"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>KVM"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"u
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>ui
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>d"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>:"9c440d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","volumeType":"ROOT","dataSto
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>re
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>":
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>{"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"5b9342
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>2e
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>-1
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>a6
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> >6-353d-88a8-2203f79b1dc6","id":209,"poolType":"RBD","host":"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >cephmon.xxxxx.net
>>>> > > >> ","path":"cloudstack","port":6789,"url":"RBD://
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> cephmon.xxxxx.net/cloudstack/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=5b93422e-1a66-353d-8
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>8
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>a8-2203f79b1dc6"}},"name":"ROOT-801","size":2621440000,"volumeId":10
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>64
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>,"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>vm
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>Name":"r-801-VM","accountId":11,"format":"RAW","id":1064,"deviceId":
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>0,
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"h
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>yp
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>ervisorType":"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":false,"options":{},"wait":0}}
>>>> > > >> >>>>>]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-1248669612:
>>>> Processing:
>>>> > > {
>>>> > > >> >> >>Ans: ,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"newData":{
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>"o
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>rg
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>.a
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>pache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"size":2621440000,"path
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>":
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>"9
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>c4
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>40d3b-cba5-4960-b8bf-dca90291cd2b","accountId":0,"format":"RAW","id"
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>:0
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>}}
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>,"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >result":true,"wait":0}}]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >}
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Seq
>>>> > 4-1248669612:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>Received: {
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Ans: , MgmtId: 161344838950, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags:
>>>> 10, {
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>CopyCmdAnswer
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >} }
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>>> > > >> >>NicProfile[
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >*1092-801-null*-46.232.xxx.246-vlan://untagged of type
>>>> > Public
>>>> > > >> >>from
>>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >nics
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >passed on vm start. The nic will be plugged later
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1093-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.1.1-vl
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >4
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>>> will
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1094-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.3.1-vl
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/4
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >3
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>>> will
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start. The nic
>>>> will
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > >> >> >>plugged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >later
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >2014-05-30 13:56:23,773 DEBUG
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >[c.c.n.r.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx-f35b12af) Removing nic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >>>>>>>NicProfile[1095-801-cd9fd29a-0573-4715-8742-00ecb9f82c9d-10.0.4.1-vl
>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>an
>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>:/
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>>/3
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >004
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >of type Guest from the nics passed on vm start
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:54, Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> Boeingavenue 271
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 20-7506672
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> +31 6-51428188
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 13:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>>>> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >> >> >>wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Joris,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >just to be sure - you want me to capture the log
>>>> from the
>>>> > > >> >>moment
>>>> > > >> >> >>I
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>reboot
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >router - or you want me to stop it, then start
>>>> capturing
>>>> > > log,
>>>> > > >> >>and
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>start it
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >(and continue capture untill ethnull errors inside
>>>> VR) ?
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 13:39, Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >><jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answers. In deed your situation is
>>>> > > different
>>>> > > >> >>so
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>PV/HVM is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> not the issue.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> When reading back the log output you have provided
>>>> I
>>>> > > noted
>>>> > > >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>VR
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> messages log indicates that it's waiting for
>>>> ethnull to
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > >> >>up.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>This
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>raises
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the question where null was introduced instead of
>>>> 1.
>>>> > The
>>>> > > >> ACS
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>management
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> log output you send was, what I think, later down
>>>> the
>>>> > > road
>>>> > > >> >> >>where
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>ACS
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>gives
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> up trying to wait for the VR to come up. If you
>>>> would
>>>> > > >> >>capture
>>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> job-executor in the management log from
>>>> startCommand
>>>> > till
>>>> > > >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>exception,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> do you see anywhere a mention of ethnull? You might
>>>> > need
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > >> >> >>reed
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>into
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> DirectAgent executing the startCommand to find a
>>>> clue.
>>>> > > The
>>>> > > >> >> >>thing
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that I
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> only have experience with XS based environment so I
>>>> > > cannot
>>>> > > >> >> >>point
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>you
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> the exact output to look for. On XS, at least, it
>>>> is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "[c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>> > > >> >>(DirectAgent-351:ctx-4a51bb9e)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>Created a
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 30/05/14 10:48, "Andrija Panic" <
>>>> > > >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hi Deen,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >no, in DB there is field "vlan_id" with value
>>>> > > "untagged" -
>>>> > > >> >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"vlan://untagged" is shown from ACS gui, and is
>>>> used
>>>> > in
>>>> > > >> API
>>>> > > >> >> >>call
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>(or
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >better
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >said commands that are seen in management server
>>>> > logs).
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Best,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 30 May 2014 10:37, Daan Hoogland
>>>> > > >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do not just assign a second net vlan://500 You
>>>> have
>>>> > > one
>>>> > > >> >>like
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>and
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> you don't want conflicting nets using the same
>>>> > vlan. I
>>>> > > >> am
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>wondering
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> why 'untagged' comes out as 'vlan://untagged'. I
>>>> > think
>>>> > > >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >>is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> bug. Did you find the string 'vlan://untagged'
>>>> in
>>>> > your
>>>> > > >> >>db?
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andrija Panic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Joris,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > thank you for taking time to address this
>>>> issue :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So...:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - I'm on KVM (stock CentOS 6.2 patched by
>>>> Inktank
>>>> > > for
>>>> > > >> >>CEPH
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>support),
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>OS
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Centos 6.5, libvirt 1.2.3 compiled.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - ACS 4.3 having problems, ACS 4.2.1 was fine
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - not XS, so I guess no answers for this part
>>>> :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - guest_os_id is 184 = Debian 7 x64
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - SVM = systemvm-kvm-4.3 = os type 184 =
>>>> Debian 7
>>>> > > x64
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This worked previously on 4.2.1 = template was
>>>> > > >> ofcourse
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>systemvm-kvm-4.2
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but that was also Debian 7 x64 type... so this
>>>> > > should
>>>> > > >> >>not
>>>> > > >> >> >>be
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>issues
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > (guest not supported by host...)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The only thing that might be out of
>>>> "standard" =
>>>> > all
>>>> > > >> >>SVMs
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>are on
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>CEPH
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there are official docs on altering database
>>>> to
>>>> > make
>>>> > > >> >>some
>>>> > > >> >> >>new
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>System
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Offering as default for SSVM and CPVM - what I
>>>> > did,
>>>> > > I
>>>> > > >> >>also
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>have
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>done
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>same
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > config in DB, to make VR use another System
>>>> > Offering
>>>> > > >> as
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>default
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>-
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > NOT explained in the docs - you could use
>>>> "Change
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>Offering..."
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>button
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>on
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exiting, shutdown VR to change it per docs...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But still this worked all fine on 4.2.1...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - regarding /var/cache/cloud/cmdline the
>>>> content
>>>> > is
>>>> > > >> >> >>folowing
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>at
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moment
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > root@r-801-VM:~# cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vpccidr=10.0.0.0/8 domain=cscloud.internal
>>>> > > >> dns1=8.8.8.8
>>>> > > >> >> >> dns2=
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> template=domP
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > name=r-801-VM eth0ip=169.254.0.75
>>>> > > eth0mask=255.255.0.0
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>type=vpcrouter
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > disable_rp_filter=true
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Also please note that only eth1 does not have
>>>> IP
>>>> > > info,
>>>> > > >> >> >>eth0
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(control
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 169.xxx) and all other eh2 and up that are
>>>> used
>>>> > for
>>>> > > >> >>Tiers
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>get IP
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>info
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fine.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I could also manually add IP for eth1 (public
>>>> NIC)
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > >> >> >>start
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>ifup
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>eth1 -
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and it works fine, but adding new IP Port
>>>> > Forwarding
>>>> > > >> >>etc
>>>> > > >> >> >>does
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>not
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>work...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Daan or somebody said it could be realted to
>>>> my
>>>> > > >> >>"Public"
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>network
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>(in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Zones, Physical Network, eth1 listing) is NOT
>>>> > tagged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(vlan://untagged)...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interestingly the only VR that does work fine
>>>> is
>>>> > the
>>>> > > >> VR
>>>> > > >> >> >>used
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>Shared
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > network, but that VR is using IP from Guest IP
>>>> > range
>>>> > > >> >>(also
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>efectively
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > public IPs but on vlan 500)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I was instructed to try to change Public IP
>>>> range
>>>> > > from
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>untagged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 500, but I'm not sure how to do this, if
>>>> there is
>>>> > > any
>>>> > > >> >>way
>>>> > > >> >> >>at
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>all
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>(editing
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "vlan" table and changing to vlan 500 does not
>>>> > work,
>>>> > > >> >>after
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>rebooting
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>VR
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from ACS gui).
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So, not sure what is roughly expected date for
>>>> > 4.4,
>>>> > > >> but
>>>> > > >> >> >>right
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>now,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > pretty stuck with a big problem of all VPC not
>>>> > > >> >> >>operational at
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>all...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 30 May 2014 08:27, Joris van Lieshout <
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> jvanliesh...@schubergphilis.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrija,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan asked me to have a look at this as well.
>>>> > > Looking
>>>> > > >> >>at
>>>> > > >> >> >>you
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>issue I
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> recall having seen something similar. Back
>>>> then
>>>> > > when
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>upgrading
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>4.2.1
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 4.3 I though it had to do with out own custom
>>>> > build
>>>> > > >> >>svm
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>template.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me fire off some questions before
>>>> explaining
>>>> > > what
>>>> > > >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>cause
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>was
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> our
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> case. :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what hypervisor (and version) are you
>>>> using?
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - if XS, is the new VR a para-virtualised
>>>> > instance
>>>> > > >> >>(PV)
>>>> > > >> >> >>or
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>hardware
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> assisted (HVM)? Do a "xe vm-param-list" on
>>>> the VR
>>>> > > >> uuid
>>>> > > >> >> >>and
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>check
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> param PV-args is set and HVM-boot-policy is
>>>> > unset.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the VR in ACS
>>>> > (guest_os_id
>>>> > > >> in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>vm_instance
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>table
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and match with table guest_os)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - what is the OS type of the SVM template?
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Now for the explaining. :)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In our case the OS type of the new template
>>>> was
>>>> > not
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>supported
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>on
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer version we are running. Therefore
>>>> the
>>>> > VR
>>>> > > >> was
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>started
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>by
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>XS
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>as
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> a
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HVM guest. System vms on XS rely on the
>>>> arguments
>>>> > > >> >>passed
>>>> > > >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>them
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PV-args param (ends up on the guest in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>/var/cache/cloud/cmdline
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>which in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> turn is used by cloud-early-config) in order
>>>> to
>>>> > > work.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>cmdline
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>contains
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> NIC configuration information.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, long story short, if a VR gets started
>>>> as a
>>>> > HVM
>>>> > > >> it
>>>> > > >> >> >>will
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>not
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>get
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> information needed to configure it's NICs.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Workaround
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We corrected the os_type_id in the DB (yes I
>>>> know
>>>> > > >> >>editing
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>DB
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> something you usually don't want but there
>>>> is no
>>>> > > >> other
>>>> > > >> >> >>way
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>in
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>this
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>case)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> of the existing VR's and of the
>>>> systemvmtemplate
>>>> > to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>something
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>supported
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> by
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> XenServer.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joris van Lieshout
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Schuberg Philis
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29/05/14 12:18, "Andrija Panic"
>>>> > > >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net
>>>> (that
>>>> > > is
>>>> > > >> >>both
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>tagged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>vlan
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >and untagged packets travel over same KVM
>>>> > bridge,
>>>> > > >> and
>>>> > > >> >> >>over
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>to
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> outside
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >world)...
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
>>>> > > >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Are these two traffic types in one
>>>> physical
>>>> > net?
>>>> > > >> or
>>>> > > >> >> >>two
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>physical
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>nets
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> on the same interface (seems wrong).
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal
>>>> > Reddy
>>>> > > >> >>Uradi
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I don't think editing DB table will
>>>> work.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Jayapal
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija
>>>> Panic
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >><andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's like this:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have public subnet /24.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is dedicated for Guest traffic
>>>> (vlan
>>>> > > 500)
>>>> > > >> >>and
>>>> > > >> >> >>the
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>second
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> half is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dedicated to Public traffic/network (no
>>>> > vlan
>>>> > > >> >>tags,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>that
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>is
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> untagged
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> packets)
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both vlan500 and untagged packets
>>>> travel
>>>> > over
>>>> > > >> >> >>physical
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>eth1
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>interface on
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hypervisors and can reach Internet.
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM,
>>>> Andrija
>>>> > > >> >>Panic <
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> 500
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork
>>>> or
>>>> > your
>>>> > > >> >> >>physical
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>network?
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> wouldn't want to have two nets with
>>>> vlan
>>>> > > 500!
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Daan
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Daan
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >--
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >--
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >Andrija Panić
>>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >> > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > >> >--------------------------------------
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Andrija Panić
>>>> > > > --------------------------------------
>>>> > > > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > > --------------------------------------
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Andrija Panić
>>>> > > --------------------------------------
>>>> > > http://admintweets.com
>>>> > > --------------------------------------
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Andrija Panić
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> http://admintweets.com
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--
Daan
