Please add this PR on your list. That will fix the spanish localization
display. Thanks
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
On 12/07/2016 19:17, Will Stevens wrote:
Thank you gentlemen. I have been following the 1608 PR from afar and I
will review your list Wido. I will get my CI chugging with some of those
PRs today.
Thx,
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
Hi Will,
These are on my list:
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1608
Those 3 should fix all the -1 votes and discussion on the list.
Wido
Op 12 juli 2016 om 18:14 schreef Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>:
Thank you, so this RC has officially failed. Can you guys please review
those PRs and give me code review so I can be confident with those PRs.
I
will run testing on those two PRs to make sure things don't break with
them.
Is there anything else that needs to be added to the next RC, please
speak
now so we can streamline this next RC.
Thanks,
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
wrote:
Hi all, I vote -1 and would like to see the jdbc:mysql and site-to-site
vpn fixed in 4.9.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1610
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
Thanks!
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:48 AM
To: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
Op 11 juli 2016 om 22:40 schreef Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>:
Hi all,
One small comment since strongSwan didn't make it into 4.9. There is
still a very simple bug in enabling PFS for site-to-site VPNs. The
code
checks the Dead Peer Detection (DPD) variable instead of the PFS
variable
when determining whether or not to enable PFS for the site-to-site VPN.
Here is the 1-line of code that is broken. You can see how it
refers to
dpd to set pfs.
file.addeq(" pfs=%s" % CsHelper.bool_to_yn(obj['dpd']))
This pull request fixes the issue, but was not merged since we were
going to strongSwan. It would be nice if this bug fix was put into
4.9.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1480
Would it make you a -1 for you without this PR? If so, please vote -1
:)
Wido
Thanks!
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
Hi All,
I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
tomorrow. If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
Will
