The code you copied was an incorrect workaround for an old bug. Just remove it.
-----Original Message----- From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit:cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/jav ascriptwoody.js Christopher Oliver wrote: >Never. It's a bug in the flow implementation if it is. The script shouldn't check for it. > Sorry Chris, but I just copied over to showForm() some code that you wrote in show(), without really understanding its behaviour ;-) Is this related to an old bug ? Can we safely remove this check ? >-----Original Message----- >From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:42 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: cvs >commit:cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/ja v >ascriptwoody.js > >On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ><snip cvs commit message/> > > >> + while (true) { >> + if (cocoon.request == null) { >> + // this continuation has been invalidated >> + this.dead = true; >> + handleInvalidContinuation(); >> + Woody.suicide(); >> + } >> >> >While we're at it... anyone knows under what conditions exactly the cocoon.request can be null? > Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
